Enriching Intentional Youth Program Experiences Through Preflection, Action, and Reflection

Authors

  • Gary D. Ellis Texas A&M University
  • Darlene Locke Texas A&M University
  • Kaylee Jorgensen Texas A&M University
  • Jingxian Jiang Texas A&M University
  • Montza Williams Texas A&M University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2022.1130

Keywords:

preflection, reflection, experience, intentional programming

Abstract

We examined effects of preflection, action, and reflection sessions on youth experiences during a 4‑H travel camp. The travel camp was one component of GLOBE, a 2-year Texas 4-H program with intentional goals of advancing understanding of agriculture, poverty, and world cultures. In morning preflection sessions, the 28 youth participants were instructed to take photographs during their day according to themes aligned with 1 of 2 of the program’s goals: building global citizenship and understanding poverty. Each day ended with a reflection session. Youth viewed a slideshow of their themed photographs. After the slideshows, youth completed questionnaires measuring elements of the quality of their subjective experiences during the slideshow: meaningfulness, perceived value of time spent, engagement, absorption, self-affirmation, and provocation. The affirmation preflection, action, and reflection sequence yielded significantly greater meaningfulness and perceived value of time spent. Effects were mediated by immediate subjective experiences of provocation, self-affirmation, absorption, and engagement.

Author Biographies

Gary D. Ellis, Texas A&M University

Department of Recreation, Park, and Tourism Sciences; Texas A&M AgriLife Research

Darlene Locke, Texas A&M University

Texas A&M AgriLife Extension

Kaylee Jorgensen, Texas A&M University

Department of Recreation, Park, and Tourism Sciences

Jingxian Jiang, Texas A&M University

Department of Recreation, Park, and Tourism Sciences

Montza Williams, Texas A&M University

Texas A&M AgriLife Extension

References

Brand, G., Osborne, A., Carroll, M., Carr, S. E., & Etherton-Beer, C. (2016). Do photographs, older adults’ narratives and collaborative dialogue foster anticipatory reflection (“preflection”) in medical students? BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0802-2

Caldwell, L., Witt, P. & Baldwin, C. (2018). Intentional programming using logic models. In P. Witt & L. Caldwell (Eds.), Youth development: Principles and practices in out-of-school time settings (pp. 279-320). Sagamore-Venture.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experiences: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 15-35). Cambridge University Press.

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Dover.

Ellis, G., Jiang, J., Freeman, P. Lacanienta, A., & Ellis, E. (2020). In situ engagement during structured leisure experiences: conceptualization, measurement, and theory testing. Leisure Sciences, published online 21 February, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2020.1713938

Ellis, G., Jiang, J., Freeman, P., Lacanienta, A., & Jamal, T. (2020). Leisure as immediate conscious experience: foundations, evaluation, and extension of the theory of structured experiences. Journal of Leisure Research, 51(5), 581-600. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2020.1754735

Ellis, G., Jiang, J., Lacanienta, A., & Carroll, M. (2019). Theming, co-creation, and quality of structured experiences at camp. Journal of Youth Development, 14(1), 230-242.

Ellis, G., Jiang, J., Locke, D., & Snider, C. (2021). Youth program activity impacts: A model of camp activities, psychological needs, and immersion. Children and Youth Services Review, 121, 105842-105842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105842

Ellis, G., Lacanienta, A., Zanolini, B., Locke, D., Jiang, J. (2020). Mindful learning experiences through structured reflections during a youth travel abroad program. Journal of Youth Development, 15(5), 172-185.

Ellis, G., Lacanienta, A., & Freeman, P. (2018). Reducing attrition from youth programs through structuring deep, valued, and impactful experiences for youth. In P. Witt & L. Caldwell (Eds.), Youth development principles and practices (pp. 351-387). Sagamore-Venture.

Ellis, G. D., Taggart, A. & Martz, J., Lepley, T. & Jamal, T. (2016). Monitoring structured experiences during youth programs: development of brief measures of perceived value and engagement. Journal of Youth Development. 11, 159-174. https://doi.org/10.5195/JYD.2016.469

Falk, D. (1995). Preflection: A strategy for enhancing reflection. Evaluation/Reflection, 22, 12-13.

Felten, P., & Clayton, P., H. (2011). Service‐learning. New directions for teaching and learning, 2011(128), 75-84.

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.

Flowers, S., Kelsen, B., & Cvitkovic, B. (2019). Learner autonomy versus guided reflection: How different methodologies affect intercultural development in online intercultural exchange. ReCALL, 31(3), 221-237. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344019000016

Freytag, G. (1898). Technique of the drama (2nd ed.). Scott Foresman.

Gardner, L., Magee, C., & Vella, S. (2017). Enjoyment and behavioral intention predict organize youth sport participation and dropout. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 14(11), 861-865.

HighScope Educational Research Foundation (2005). The youth program quality assessment: A research-validated instrument and comprehensive system for accountability, evaluation, program improvement.

Hutchinson, S. & Dattilo, J. (2001). Processing: Possibilities for therapeutic recreation. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 35(1), 43-56.

Ifenthaler, D., & Lehmann, T. (2012). Preactional self-regulation as a tool for successful problem solving and learning. Technology, Instruction, Cognition & Learning, 9(1), 97-110.

Jiang, J., Ellis, G., Ettekal, A., & Nelson, C. (2021). Situational engagement experiences: measurement options and theory testing. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Association of Collegiate Marketing Educators, online, March 17, 2021.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. A. (2009). The learning way: Meta–cognitive aspects of experiential learning. Simulation Gaming, 40, 297–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878108325713

Langer, E. J. (2000). Mindful learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(6), 220-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00099

Langer, E. J. (2016). The power of mindful learning. (2nd ed.).De Capo Press.

Larsen, D. (2003). Meaningful interpretation. Eastern National.

Luckner, J. L., & Nadler, R. S. (1997). Processing the experience: Strategies to enhance and generalize learning (2nd ed.). Kendall/ Hunt.

McGuire, J. & Doty, V. (2010). Students as practitioners in a service learning context. Michigan Family Review, 14(1), 110-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/mfr.4919087.0014.110

Pine, B. & Gilmore, J. (2020). The experience economy. Harvard Business Review Press.

Priest, S., & Gass, M. A. (1997). Effective leadership in adventure programming. Human Kinetics.

Priest, S. & Naismith, M. (1993). A model for debriefing experiences. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership, 10(3), 20-22.

Reeve, J. (2013). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.). Research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). Springer.

Shellenbarger T, Palmer EA, Labant AL, & Kuzneski JL. (2005). Use of faculty reflection to improve teaching. Annual Review of Nursing Education, 3, 343–357.

Sibthorp, J., Paisley, K. & Hill, E. (2003) Intentional programming in wilderness education revisiting its roots. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 74(8), 21-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2003.10608497

Sibthorp, J., Wilson, C., Povilaitis, V., & Brown, L. (2020). Active ingredients of learning at summer camp. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education 23, 21-37.

Simpkins Chaput, S., Little, P.M.D., & Weiss, H. (August 2004) Understanding and measuring attendance in out-of-school time programs. Issues and Opportunities in Out-of-School Time Evaluation, 7. https://archive.globalfrp.org/out-of-school-time/publications-resources/understanding-and-measuring-attendance-in-out-of-school-time-programs

Slavich, G. M., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2012). Transformational teaching: Theoretical underpinnings, basic principles, and core methods. Educational Psychology Review, 24(4), 569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9199-6

Smith, C., Akiva, T., Arrieux, D., & Jones, M. (2006). Improving quality at the point of service. New Directions for Youth Development, 2006(112), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.195

Smith, C. A., Strand, S. E., & Bunting, C. J. (2002). The Influence of challenge course participation on moral and ethical reasoning. Journal of Experiential Education, 25(2), 278-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590202500205

Tilden, F. (1977). Interpreting our heritage (3rd ed.). University of North Carolina Press.

Wallace, S. G. & Michel, D. (2021). The intentional thread, a conversation about courage, hope, good spirit, and peace. Camping Magazine, January-February, 68-72. https://www.acacamps.org/resource-library/camping-magazine/intentional-thread-conversation-about-courage-hope-good-spirit-peace

Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-ends model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 2–22.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-28

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022)

Section

Feature Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.