A Self-Assessment Approach to Understanding 4-H Professional Development Needs in the Northeast

Authors

  • Marycarmen Kunicki Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
  • Marissa Staffen Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
  • Jennifer E. Cushman University of Connecticut
  • Rachel Lyons Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
  • Lisa Phelps University of Maine
  • Kevin Sullivan Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2022.1201

Keywords:

PRKC, professional development, 4-H, positive youth development, self-assessment

Abstract

In 2017, the National 4-H professional research, knowledge, and competencies (PRKC) taxonomy was updated reflecting the current needs of 4-H youth development professionals. Knowledge and skill gaps of 4-H professionals need to be identified to optimize resource allocation for professional development on the state and regional level. We developed a web-based self-assessment of the PRKC tool using Qualtrics, that evaluated the core competencies across the 6 PRKC domains: (a) youth development; (b) youth program development; (c) volunteerism; (d) equity, access, and opportunity; (e) partnerships; and (f) organizational systems. The responses from 188 Extension 4-H professionals (approximately a quarter of the 4-H Extension professionals in the Northeast region) were analyzed to (a) identify the knowledge and skills gaps in competencies within 6 domains, and (b) provide suggestions for professional development that would be of value to each state or region, based on the aggregate data. The results show respondents perceived their personal knowledge, skills, and competencies highest in the domains of access, equity, and opportunity and organizational systems. The domains with the lowest perceived personal effectiveness were youth program development and volunteerism. Not surprisingly, the aggregate results indicate that respondents with a greater number of years of experience in Extension reported higher competency in three domains (youth program development, volunteerism, and organizational systems). This tool can be utilized by Extension at any level to better understand the needs of the 4-H professional workforce. Results can aid the design of professional development opportunities to meet the knowledge and skill gaps identified among respondents.

References

Arnold, M. E. (2020). America’s moment: Investing in positive youth development to transform youth and society. Journal of Youth Development, 15(5), 16–36. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2020.996

Arnold, M., & Gagnon, R. (2020). Positive youth development theory in practice: An update on the 4-H Thriving Model. Journal of Youth Development, 15(6), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2020.954

Arnold, M. E., & Rennekamp, R. A. (2020). A time like no other: 4-H Youth Development and COVID-19. Journal of Extension, 58(3). https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/joe/vol58/iss3/32

Astroth, K., & Lindstrom, J. (2008). Investing in professional development: Building and sustaining a viable 4-H youth workforce for the future. Journal of Youth Development, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2008.303

Borden, L. M., Perkins, D. F., & Hawkey, K. (2014). 4-H Youth Development: The past, the present, and the future. Journal of Extension, 52(4). https://archives.joe.org/joe/2014august/comm1.php

Chang, A., Martin, R., & Marrapoi, E. (2020, August 16). Summer of racial reckoning [Radio broadcast]. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2020/08/16/902179773/summer-of-racial-reckoning-the-match-lit

Donaldson, S. I., & Grant-Vallone, E. J. (2002). Understanding self-report bias in organizational behavior research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(2), 245–262. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A%3A1019637632584

Garst, B. A., Baughman, S., & Franz, N. (2014). Benchmarking professional development practices across youth-serving organizations: Implications for Extension. Journal of Extension, 52(5). https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/joe/vol52/iss5/11

Garst, B. A., Hunnings, J. R., Jamison, K., Hairston, J., & Meadows, R. R. (2007). Development of a comprehensive new 4-H Extension agents training program using a multi-module approach and the 4-H professional research, knowledge, and competencies (4HPRKC) taxonomy. Journal of Extension, 45(1). https://archives.joe.org/joe/2007february/a3.php

Gerdes, J., Durden, T. R., Mincemoyer, C. C., & Lodl, K. (2013). Preparing adults to work with youth: An environmental scan of professional development. Journal of Youth Development, 8(2), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2013.93

Heck, K., Subramaniam, A., & Carlos, R. (2009). Use of the PRKC tool in assessment of staff development needs: Experiences from California. Journal of Extension, 47(3).

https://archives.joe.org/joe/2009june/a7.php

Judd, C. M., Smith, E. R., & Kidder, L. H. (1991). Research Methods in Social Relations (6th ed.). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1999-15054-002

McDowell, G. R. (2001). Land-grant universities and Extension into the 21st century. Iowa State University Press.

National Institute for Food and Agriculture. (2017a). Growing together: 4-H professional, research, knowledge, and competencies.

https://nifa.usda.gov/sites/default/files/resources/4-H%20PRKC%202017%20Guide.pdf

National Institute of Food and Agriculture. (2017b). Planning for professional development using 4-H PRKC Self-Assessment. https://nifa.usda.gov/sites/default/files/resources/4-H%20PRKC%202017%20Self-Assessment.pdf

Stone, B., & Rennekamp, R. (2004). New foundations for the 4-H youth development profession: 4-H professional research, knowledge, and competencies study, 2004. Conducted in cooperation with the National 4-H Professional Development Task Force.

Vagias, W. M. (2006). Likert-type scale response anchors. Clemson International Institute for Tourism & Research Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management. Clemson University. http://media.clemson.edu/cbshs/prtm/research/resources-for-research-page-2/Vagias-Likert-Type-Scale-Response-Anchors.pdf

Downloads

Published

2022-09-27

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 3 (2022)

Section

Research & Evaluation Studies

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.