Civic Engagement and Advocacy in Rural Wisconsin: Youth Development Through Legislative Forums

Authors

  • Doug Liphart University of Wisconsin-Madison, Division of Extension
  • Neil James Klemme University of Wisconsin-Madison, Division of Extension
  • Ian B. Meeker University of Wisconsin-Madison, Division of Extension

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2022.1194

Keywords:

civic engagement, social capital, civic skills, youth–adult partnerships

Abstract

Youth Development programming that engages youth to work side by side with local leaders creates an environment where youth develop civic skills. These skills include a greater understanding of the legislative process, their role in our democracy, and increased engagement in the democratic process. Through their participation in the Superior Days Legislative Forum, youth increase their civic skills, are inspired to create change in their communities, ask questions and respond to challenges by bringing legislative issues of concern unique to their community to the entire representative body at the state capitol. Youth delegates also gain experience partnering with adults from their communities, establish healthy developmental relationships, and expand their social networks. This article draws from research related to civic engagement, youth in decision-making roles, and programming intended to raise youth voice to make community change. This paper uses focus group interviews as well as post-then-pre-program surveys to understand the impact of the Superior Days Legislative Forum on youth participants.

Author Biographies

Doug Liphart, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Division of Extension

Doug is a Professor with the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Division of Extension. His programming focuses on building future leaders with strong character. Highlights from his programming include a restorative justice program, leadership programming in a variety of classroom, community and outdoor settings, as well as strong partnerships with the tribal communities within his county. 

Neil James Klemme, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Division of Extension

Neil is currently Associate Professor with Tenure with the University of Wisconsin Extension Institute of Positive Youth Development . His programming focusses on Youth Engagement in community leadership, youth in governance programming and community development initiatives.He uses placemaking principles to help youth understand the needs of their community and to build a stronger connection to the communities they live in.

Ian B. Meeker, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Division of Extension

Ian is an Associate Professor for the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s Division of Extension.  Ian’s area of Academic focus within the Institute of Positive Youth Development is Outdoor Leadership Education. He can be found on the south shore of Lake Superior integrating leadership development and an appreciation for the natural world through kayaking, mountain biking, canoeing and cross country skiing.

References

Anderson, C., Baker, B., Brown, M., Calvert, M., Fields, N., Henness, S., Klemme, N., Nathaniel, K. C., & Lonning, J. (2019). Contribution of 4-H participation to the development of social capital within communities: Toolkit. National 4-H.

Arnold, M. E. (2018). From context to outcomes: A thriving model for 4-H youth development programs. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 6(1). https://www.jhseonline.com/article/view/653

Benson, P. L., Scales, P. C., Hamilton, S. F., & Sesma Jr, A. (2006). Positive youth development: Theory, research, and applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0116

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, pp. 241–258. Greenwood.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Camino, L., & Zeldin, S. (2002). From periphery to center: Pathways for youth civic engagement in the day-to-day life of communities. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0604_8

Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. (2013). All together now: Collaboration and innovation for youth engagement (Report of the Commission on Youth Voting and Civic Knowledge). www.civicyouth.org/about-circle/commission-on-youth-voting-civic-knowledge/

Doolittle, A., & Faul, A. C. (2013). Civic engagement scale: A validation study. Sage Open, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013495542

Flanagan, C. A., & Faison, N. (2001). Youth civic development: Implications of research for social policy and programs. Civic Engagement. Paper 11. http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slceciviceng/11

Flanagan, C. A., & Levine, P. (2008). Civic engagement and the transition to adulthood. The Future of Children, 20(1), 149–179. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.0.0043

Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Introduction to applied thematic analysis. In G. Guest, K. M. MacQueen, & E. E. Namey (Eds.), Applied thematic analysis, (pp. 3–20). https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436.n1

Henness, S. A., Ball, A. L., & Moncheski, M. (2013). A community development approach to service‐learning: Building social capital between rural youth and adults. New Directions for Youth Development, 2013(138), 75–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yd.20059

National 4-H Council. (2020). Beyond the gap; How America can address the widening opportunity gap facing young people. https://4-h.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Beyond-the-Gap-White-paper.pdf

Niemi, R. G., & Junn, J. (1998). Civic education: What makes students learn. Yale University Press.

Norman, J. (2001). Building effective youth-adult partnerships. IAPAC Monthly, 7(12), 323–326.

Pittman, K. (1999). The power of youth engagement. Youth Today, 8, 63.

Schlegel, A., & Barry, H., III. (1991). Adolescence: An anthropological inquiry. Free Press.

Sherrod, L. R., Flanagan, C., & Youniss, J. (2002). Dimensions of citizenship and opportunities for youth development: The what, why, when, where, and who of citizenship development. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0604_14

Torney-Purta, J. (2000). Comparative perspectives on political socialization and civic education. Comparative Education Review, 44(1), 88–95.

White, R., & Wyn, J. (1998). Youth agency and social context. Journal of sociology, 34(3), 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/144078339803400307

Zeldin, S., McDaniel, A. K., Topitzes, D., & Calvert, M. (2000). Youth in decision-making: A study on the impacts of youth on adults and organizations. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

Zeldin, S., Christens, B. D., & Powers, J. L. (2013). The psychology and practice of youth-adult partnership: Bridging generations for youth development and community change. American journal of community psychology, 51(3), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9558-y

Downloads

Published

2022-09-27

Issue

Section

Feature Articles