Social Media Friends From Afterschool are Associated With Positive Youth Development in Digital Settings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2022.1173Keywords:
after-school activities, middle school, positive youth development, peers, social media, adolescenceAbstract
Positive youth development has been extensively documented in contexts such as the family, school, and afterschool. Emerging theory and research indicate that digital contexts such as social media may also be venues through which young people develop skills and attributes associated with the 5 Cs model of positive youth development and thriving. This research attempted to understand if and how middle school youth’s in-person and online networks connect, and if they do connect, do these connections relate to engaging in beliefs and behaviors associated with PYD. Results suggest that in this sample, middle school youth include peers from afterschool in their online networks, and those who have friends from afterschool and school engaged in PYD- related social media behaviors at higher rates than those who were not connected to in-person networks. No association was found between the amount of time spent in after-school contexts and any of the positive or problematic social media outcomes in this study. Implications for youth development professionals considering the influence of social media on youth, and next steps for research on after-school activities and social media use of middle school youth are discussed.
References
Afterschool Alliance (2020). America after 3pm: Demand grows opportunity shrinks. http://afterschoolalliance.org/documents/AA3PM-2020/AA3PM-National-Report.pdf
Alison Bryant, J., Sanders-Jackson, A., & Smallwood, A. M. K. (2006). IMing, text messaging, and adolescent social networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00028.x
Anderson, M. (2018, September 27). A majority of teens have experienced some form of cyberbullying. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/09/27/a-majority-of-teens-have-experienced-some-form-of-cyberbullying
Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018a, May 31). Teens, social media and technology 2018. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/
Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018b, November 28). Teens’ social media habits and experiences. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/11/28/teens-social-media-habits-and-experiences/
Brinthaupt, T. M., & Lipka, R. P. (Eds.). (2012). Understanding early adolescent self and identity: Applications and interventions. Suny Press.
Charmaraman, L., Gladstone, T., & Richer, A. (2018). Positive and negative associations with technology on adolescent mental health. In M. Moreno, & A. Radovic (Eds.), Technology and adolescent mental health (pp. 61–71). Springer.
Charmaraman, L., Lynch, A. D., Richer, A. M., & Grossman, J. M. (2022). Associations of early
social media initiation on digital behaviors and the moderating role of limiting use. Computers in Human Behavior, 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107053
Charmaraman, L., Richer, A. M., & Moreno, M. A. (2020). Social and behavioral health factors associated with violent and mature gaming in early adolescence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 4996. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17144996
Charmaraman, L., Richer, A. M., Ben-Joseph, E. P., & Klerman, E. (2021). Quantity, content, and context matter: Associations among social technology use and sleep habits in early adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 69(1), 162-165.
Coughlan, S. (2016, February 9). Safer Internet day: Young ignore ‘social media age limit’. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/education-35524429
Davis, K. (2012). Friendship 2.0: Adolescents' experiences of belonging and self-disclosure online. Journal of adolescence, 35(6), 1527-1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.02.013
Davis, K. (2013). Young people’s digital lives: The impact of interpersonal relationships and digital media use on adolescents’ sense of identity. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2281-2293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.022
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., & Pachan, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3-4), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9300-6
Eccles, J. S. and Gootman, J. A., 2002. Features of positive developmental settings. In J. S. Eccles and J. A. Gootman (Eds.), Community programs to promote youth development. National Academy Press, 86-118.
Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2008). Participation in extracurricular activities in the middle school years: Are there developmental benefits for African American and European American youth? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(9), 1029-1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9309-4
Geldhof, G. J., Bowers, E. P., Boyd, M. J., Mueller, M. K., Napolitano, C. M., Schmid, K. L., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2014). The creation and validation of short and very short measures of PYD. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(1), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12039
James, C. (2013). Net generation of youth: A case study of students in a technology-based youth development program [Doctoral dissertation, New York University]. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/pagepdf/1464389295?accountid=14586
James, C., Davis, K., Charmaraman, L., Konrath, S., Slovak, P., Weinstein, E., & Yarosh, L. (2017). Digital life and youth well-being, social connectedness, empathy, and narcissism. Pediatrics, 140(Supplement 2), S71-S75. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758f
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00248
Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults (Pew Research Center report). Pew Internet & American Life Project. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2010/02/03/social-media-and-young-adults/
Lerner, R. M. (2004). Liberty: Thriving and civic engagement among America's youth. Sage.
McCloskey, W., Iwanicki, S., Lauterbach, D., Giammittorio, D. M., & Maxwell, K. (2015). Are Facebook “friends” helpful? Development of a Facebook-based measure of social support and examination of relationships among depression, quality of life, and social support. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(9), 499-505. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0538
Peter, J., Valkenburg, P. M., & Schouten, A. P. (2005). Developing a model of adolescent friendship formation on the Internet. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(5), 423-430. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.423
Przybylski, A. K., & Bowes, L. (2017). Cyberbullying and adolescent well-being in England: A population-based cross-sectional study. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 1(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-4642(17)30011-1
Ram Lee, A., & Horlsey, J. S. (2017). The role of social media on positive youth development: An analysis of 4-H Facebook page and 4-H’ers’ positive development. Children and Youth Services Review, 77(C), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.04.014
Rideout, V., Fox, S. (2018). Digital health practices, social media use, and mental well-being among teens and young adults in the U.S. Hopelab & Well Being Trust. assets.hopelab.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/a-national-survey-by-hopelab-and-well-being-trust-2018.pdf
Rideout, V., & Robb, M. (2019). The Common Sense census: Media use by tweens and teens. Common Sense Media.
Ross, K. M., & Tolan, P. H. (2021). Positive youth development in the digital age: Expanding PYD to include digital settings. In R. Dimitrova & N. Wiium (Eds.), Handbook of positive youth development (pp. 531-548). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70262-5_35
Russell, C. A., Reisner, E. A., Pearson, L. M., Afolabi, K. P., Miller, T. D., & Mielke, M. B. (2006). Evaluation of the out-of-school time initiative. Report on the first year. Policy Studies Associates.
Selkie, E. M., Fales, J. L., & Moreno, M. A. (2017). Cyberbullying prevalence among United States middle and high school aged adolescents: A systematic review and quality assessment. Journal of Adolescent Health, 58(2): 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2012.00812.x
Smith, E. P., Witherspoon, D. P., & Wayne Osgood, D. (2017). Positive youth development among diverse racial–ethnic children: Quality afterschool contexts as developmental assets. Child Development, 88(4), 1063-1078. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12870
Steinberg, L. (2007). Risk taking in adolescence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 55-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00475.x
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267
Valkenburg, P. M., Schouten, A. P., & Peter, J. (2005). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet. New Media & Society, 7(3), 383-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444805052282
Vandell, D. L., Larson, R. W., Mahoney, J. L., & Watts, T. W. (2015). Children's organized activities. In M. H. Bornstein & T. Leventhal (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Vol. 4. Theory and method (7th ed., pp. 305-344). Wiley.
Ybarra, M. L., Alexander, C., & Mitchell, K. J. (2005). Depressive symptomatology, youth Internet use, and online interactions: A national survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 36(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.10.012
Ybarra, M. L., Diener-West, M., & Leaf, P. J. (2007). Examining the overlap in Internet harassment and school bullying: Implications for school intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S42-S50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.004
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.