4-H Youth Volunteer Retention in Science Projects

Authors

  • Veronica Del Bianco Louisiana State University, Agricultural and Extension Education and Evaluation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9088-9488
  • Melissa Cater Louisiana State University, Agricultural and Extension Education and Evaluation
  • Janet Fox University of Tennessee Extension Institute of Agriculture

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2021.1004

Keywords:

youth volunteers, retention, citizen science, science, engagement

Abstract

Retention of volunteers and participants is a critical concern for programs that rely on their manpower, but limited empirical research exists, especially on youth volunteers. This descriptive, cross-sectional quantitative study examined the influence of volunteer motivation, participation, and science project type on the retention of 4-H youth volunteers ages 12 to 19 years participating in science projects in 3 states. An instrument was created for this study that included both existing survey scales and researcher-developed items based on combined research from the citizen science, volunteer development, and youth development fields. The research revealed that consistency and engagement were correlated with the predictors of retention, but race was not. 4-H science programs have a significantly higher likelihood of retaining youth participants than 4-H citizen science programs. Suggestions for youth educators to develop retention strategies are discussed based on the findings and future research into youth volunteer engagement is proposed.

References

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x

Bohnert, A., Fredricks, J., & Randall, E. (2010). Capturing unique dimensions of youth organized activity involvement: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Review of Educational Research, 80(4), 576-610. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310364533

Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977-984. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9

Chacón, F., Gutiérrez, G., Sauto, V., Vecina, M. L., & Pérez, A. (2017). Volunteer functions inventory: A systematic review. Psicothema, 29(3), 306-316.

Champine, R. B., & Johnson, S. K. (2017). Towards the promotion of positive development among boys in challenging contexts: A mixed-methods study of engagement in the Scoutreach initiative. Journal of Youth Development, 12(4), 16-37. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2017.521

Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J., & Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516

Crimmins, T. M., Weltzin, J. F., Rosemartin, A. H., Surina, E. M., Marsh, L., & Denny, E. G.(2014). Focused campaign increases activity among participants in nature’s notebook, a citizen science project. Natural Sciences Education, 43(1), 64-72. https://doi.org/10.4195/nse2013.06.0019

Curtis, V. (2015). Motivation to participate in an online citizen science game: A study of Foldit. Science Communication, 37(6), 723-746. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015609322

Del Bianco, V. (2018). Citizen science in 4-H: Youth volunteer motivations, participation, retention and scientific literacy [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Louisiana State University. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/4751/

Eisinga, R., Teelken, C., & Doorewaard, H. (2010). Assessing cross-national invariance of the three-component model of organizational commitment: A six-country study of European university faculty. Cross-Cultural Research, 44(4), 341-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397110370932

Follett, R., & Strezov, V. (2015). An analysis of citizen science based research: Usage and publication patterns. PloS one, 10(11), e0143687. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143687

Frensley, T., Crall, A., Stern, M., Jordan, R., Gray, S., Prysby, M., Newman, G., Hmelo-Silver, C., Meloor, D., & Huang, J. (2017). Bridging the benefits of online and community supported citizen science: A case study on motivation and retention with conservation-oriented volunteers. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1), 4. http://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.84

Funk, C., & Parker, K., January 2018. Women and men in STEM often at odds over workplace equity. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/01/09/women-and-men-in-stem-often-at-odds-over-workplace-equity/

Kline, P. (1999). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Li, Y., & Lerner, R. M. (2013). Interrelations of behavioral, emotional, and cognitive school engagement in high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(1), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9857-5

Mahoney, J. L., Vandell, D. L., Simpkins, S., & Zarrett, N. (2009). Adolescent out-of-school activities. Handbook of adolescent psychology, 2, 228-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy002008

Martin, V. Y., Christidis, L., & Pecl, G. T. (2016). Public interest in marine citizen science: Is there potential for growth?. BioScience, 66(8), 683-692. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw070

McDougle, L. M., Greenspan, I., & Handy, F. (2011). Generation green: Understanding the motivations and mechanisms influencing young adults' environmental volunteering. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16(4), 325-341.. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.431

Newton, C., Becker, K., & Bell, S. (2014). Learning and development opportunities as a tool for the retention of volunteers: A motivational perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 24(4), 514-530. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12040

Raddick, M. J., Bracey, G., Gay, P. L., Lintott, C. J., Murray, P., Schawinski, K., Szalay, A. S., & Vandenberg, J. (2009). Galaxy zoo: Exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers. Astronomy Education Review, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3847/AER2009036

Rotman, D., Hammock, J., Preece, J., Hansen, D., Boston, C., Bowser, A., & He, Y. (2014, March 4-7). Motivations affecting initial and long-term participation in citizen science projects in three countries [Paper presentation]. iConference 2014 Proceedings (p. 110-124). https://doi.org/10.9776/14054

Seymour, V., & Haklay, M. H. (2017). Exploring engagement characteristics and behaviours of environmental volunteers. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1), 5. http://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.66

Spera, C., Ghertner, R., Nerino, A., & DiTommaso, A. (2013).Volunteering as a pathway to employment: Does volunteering increase odds of finding a job for the out of work? Office of Research & Evaluation, Corporation for National and Community Service, Office of Research and Evaluation. https://americorps.gov/sites/default/files/evidenceexchange/FR_2013_VolunteeringasaPathwaytoEmployment_1.pdf

van der Wal, R., Sharma, N., Mellish, C., Robinson, A., & Siddharthan, A. (2016). The role of automated feedback in training and retaining biological recorders for citizen science. Conservation Biology, 30(3), 550-561. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12705

West, S. E., & Pateman, R. M. (2016). Recruiting and retaining participants in citizen science: What can be learned from the volunteering literature? Citizen Science: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.8

Downloads

Published

2021-09-29

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 4 (2021)

Section

Research & Evaluation Studies

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.