4-H Youth Volunteer Retention in Science Projects

Veronica Del Bianco, Melissa Cater, Janet Fox


Retention of volunteers and participants is a critical concern for programs that rely on their manpower, but limited empirical research exists, especially on youth volunteers. This descriptive, cross-sectional quantitative study examined the influence of volunteer motivation, participation, and science project type on the retention of 4-H youth volunteers ages 12 to 19 years participating in science projects in 3 states. An instrument was created for this study that included both existing survey scales and researcher-developed items based on combined research from the citizen science, volunteer development, and youth development fields. The research revealed that consistency and engagement were correlated with the predictors of retention, but race was not. 4-H science programs have a significantly higher likelihood of retaining youth participants than 4-H citizen science programs. Suggestions for youth educators to develop retention strategies are discussed based on the findings and future research into youth volunteer engagement is proposed.


youth volunteers; retention; citizen science; science; engagement

Full Text:



Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x

Bohnert, A., Fredricks, J., & Randall, E. (2010). Capturing unique dimensions of youth organized activity involvement: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Review of Educational Research, 80(4), 576-610. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310364533

Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977-984. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9

Chacón, F., Gutiérrez, G., Sauto, V., Vecina, M. L., & Pérez, A. (2017). Volunteer functions inventory: A systematic review. Psicothema, 29(3), 306-316.

Champine, R. B., & Johnson, S. K. (2017). Towards the promotion of positive development among boys in challenging contexts: A mixed-methods study of engagement in the Scoutreach initiative. Journal of Youth Development, 12(4), 16-37. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2017.521

Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J., & Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516

Crimmins, T. M., Weltzin, J. F., Rosemartin, A. H., Surina, E. M., Marsh, L., & Denny, E. G.(2014). Focused campaign increases activity among participants in nature’s notebook, a citizen science project. Natural Sciences Education, 43(1), 64-72. https://doi.org/10.4195/nse2013.06.0019

Curtis, V. (2015). Motivation to participate in an online citizen science game: A study of Foldit. Science Communication, 37(6), 723-746. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015609322

Del Bianco, V. (2018). Citizen science in 4-H: Youth volunteer motivations, participation, retention and scientific literacy [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Louisiana State University. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/4751/

Eisinga, R., Teelken, C., & Doorewaard, H. (2010). Assessing cross-national invariance of the three-component model of organizational commitment: A six-country study of European university faculty. Cross-Cultural Research, 44(4), 341-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397110370932

Follett, R., & Strezov, V. (2015). An analysis of citizen science based research: Usage and publication patterns. PloS one, 10(11), e0143687. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143687

Frensley, T., Crall, A., Stern, M., Jordan, R., Gray, S., Prysby, M., Newman, G., Hmelo-Silver, C., Meloor, D., & Huang, J. (2017). Bridging the benefits of online and community supported citizen science: A case study on motivation and retention with conservation-oriented volunteers. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1), 4. http://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.84

Funk, C., & Parker, K., January 2018. Women and men in STEM often at odds over workplace equity. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/01/09/women-and-men-in-stem-often-at-odds-over-workplace-equity/

Kline, P. (1999). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Li, Y., & Lerner, R. M. (2013). Interrelations of behavioral, emotional, and cognitive school engagement in high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(1), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9857-5

Mahoney, J. L., Vandell, D. L., Simpkins, S., & Zarrett, N. (2009). Adolescent out-of-school activities. Handbook of adolescent psychology, 2, 228-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy002008

Martin, V. Y., Christidis, L., & Pecl, G. T. (2016). Public interest in marine citizen science: Is there potential for growth?. BioScience, 66(8), 683-692. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw070

McDougle, L. M., Greenspan, I., & Handy, F. (2011). Generation green: Understanding the motivations and mechanisms influencing young adults' environmental volunteering. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16(4), 325-341.. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.431

Newton, C., Becker, K., & Bell, S. (2014). Learning and development opportunities as a tool for the retention of volunteers: A motivational perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 24(4), 514-530. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12040

Raddick, M. J., Bracey, G., Gay, P. L., Lintott, C. J., Murray, P., Schawinski, K., Szalay, A. S., & Vandenberg, J. (2009). Galaxy zoo: Exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers. Astronomy Education Review, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3847/AER2009036

Rotman, D., Hammock, J., Preece, J., Hansen, D., Boston, C., Bowser, A., & He, Y. (2014, March 4-7). Motivations affecting initial and long-term participation in citizen science projects in three countries [Paper presentation]. iConference 2014 Proceedings (p. 110-124). https://doi.org/10.9776/14054

Seymour, V., & Haklay, M. H. (2017). Exploring engagement characteristics and behaviours of environmental volunteers. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1), 5. http://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.66

Spera, C., Ghertner, R., Nerino, A., & DiTommaso, A. (2013).Volunteering as a pathway to employment: Does volunteering increase odds of finding a job for the out of work? Office of Research & Evaluation, Corporation for National and Community Service, Office of Research and Evaluation. https://americorps.gov/sites/default/files/evidenceexchange/FR_2013_VolunteeringasaPathwaytoEmployment_1.pdf

van der Wal, R., Sharma, N., Mellish, C., Robinson, A., & Siddharthan, A. (2016). The role of automated feedback in training and retaining biological recorders for citizen science. Conservation Biology, 30(3), 550-561. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12705

West, S. E., & Pateman, R. M. (2016). Recruiting and retaining participants in citizen science: What can be learned from the volunteering literature? Citizen Science: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.8

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2021.1004

Copyright (c) 2021 Veronica Del Bianco, Melissa Cater, Janet Fox

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.