Youth Perspectives on Virtual After-School Programming During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Authors

  • Candace Evans Georgia State University
  • Renita Moore Georgia State University
  • Scot Seitz Georgia State University
  • Isatou Jatta Georgia State University
  • Gabriel P. Kuperminc Georgia State University
  • Christopher C. Henrich Georgia State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2021.1063

Keywords:

afters-chool programs, virtual programming, 21st CCLC, program participation

Abstract

After-school programs provide a range of support for students. During school closures due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many after-school programs were also forced to close or to find new ways to provide services to youth, such as through virtual after-school programming. We surveyed 244 youth who participated in virtual after-school programs about their access to virtual programming as well as their experiences. We considered their pre-closure experiences as well. We also surveyed 8 program directors of after-school programs who were providing virtual programming. We found that Internet access hindered the ability of more than 1 in 4 students to access the programs. Pre-closure program experiences, including ongoing relationships with program staff and positive peer relationships contributed to more positive experiences with virtual programming. Whenever students were able to access the programs, they generally reported positive experiences. This work has implications for after-school program providers, parents, and policymakers.

References

Afterschool Alliance (n.d.). Virtual programming. (https://afterschoolalliance.org/covid/curriculum.cfm)

Afterschool Alliance (2014). America after 3pm: Afterschool programs in demand. (https://www.afterschoolalliance.org/documents/AA3PM-2014/AA3PM_Key_Findings.pdf)

Afterschool Alliance (2017). What does the research say about afterschool? (http://afterschoolalliance.org/documents/What_Does_the_Research_Say_About_Afterschool.pdf)

Afterschool Alliance (2020). Afterschool and summer COVID-19 response: Helping to meet students’ learning needs. (http://afterschoolalliance.org/documents/AA%20Helping%20to%20Meet%20Student%20Learnng%20Needs.pdf)

Akiva, T., Cortina, K. S., Eccles, J. S., & Smith, C. (2013). Youth belonging and cognitive engagement in organized activities: A large-scale field study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 208-218.

Authentic Connection. (2020). Student response survey: Preliminary findings and recommendations [White Paper]. (https://www.authconn.com/files/Authentic%20Connections%20SRS%20White%20Paper.pdf)

Bartlett, J. D., & Steber, K. (2019). How to implement trauma-informed care to build resilience to childhood trauma. Trauma, 9, 10.

California School Climate, Health, and Learning Surveys. (2019). California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS). Retrieved September 26, 2019 (https://calschls.org/about/the-surveys/#chks).

Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 98-124.

Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1997). School adjustment: Child. Available from the Fast Track Project website (http://www.fasttrackproject.org).

Education Trust-West. (2020). The digital divide in higher education. (https://west.edtrust.org/resource/the-digital-divide-in-higher-ed/)

Ellis, W. E., Dumas, T. M., & Forbes, L. M. (2020). Physically isolated but socially connected: Psychological adjustment and stress among adolescents during the initial COVID-19 crisis. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 52(3), 177-187. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000215)

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). Student engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.

Halpern, R. (2002). A different kind of child development institution: The history of after-school programs for low-income children. Teachers College Record. 104(2), 178-211.

Hirsch, B.J., Roffman, J. G., Deutsch, N. L., Flynn, C., & Pagano, M. E. (2000). Inner-city youth development programs: Strengthening programs for adolescent girls. Journal of Early Adolescence, 20(2), 210-230.

Huang, D., Coordt, A., La Torre, D., Leon, S., Miyoshi, J., Perez, P., Peterson, C. (2007). The afterschool hours: Examining the relationships between afterschool staff-based social capital and student engagement in LA’s BEST. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). (https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED503297.pdf)

Jones, J., & Deutsch, N. (2011). Relational strategies in after-school settings: How staff-youth relationships support positive development. Youth & Society, 43(4), 1381-1406.

Katz, M. (2020, April). Rising to the coronavirus challenge-How the new T-Mobile is working hard to help bridge the gap between students and teachers. Forbes. (https://z.umn.edu/forbes-rising-to-the-coronavirus-challenge)

Kuperminc, G., Chan, W., & Hale, K. (2018). Group mentoring for resilience: Increasing positive development and reducing involvement in the juvenile justice system (Final Technical Report). (https://ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/grants/252131.pdf)

Kuperminc, G. P., Seitz, S., Joseph, H., Khatib, N., Wilson, C., Collins, K., & Guessous, O. (2019). Enhancing program quality in a national sample of after‐school settings: The role of youth–staff interactions and staff/organizational functioning. American Journal of Community Psychology, 63(3-4), 391-404. (https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12329)

Leos-Urbel, J. (2015). What works after school? The relationship between after-school program quality, program attendance, and academic outcomes. Youth & Society, 47(5), 684-706.

Luthar, S., & Mendes, S. (2020). Trauma-informed schools: Supporting educators as they support the children. International Journal of School and Educational Psychology, 8(2), 147-157.

Maumary-Gremaud, A. (2000). School adjustment - child grade 6/year 7 (Fast Track Project Technical Report). Available from the Fast Track Project website (http://www.fasttrackproject.org/).

Monte Verde, P., Watkins, M., Enriquez, D., Nater, S., & Harris, J. C. (2019). Community youth development service-learning: trauma-informed and culturally responsive. Journal of Youth Development, 14(2), 99-114. (https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2019.714)

Morales, S., Otoo, S., & Chatterjee, S. (2020). Emergency closure in education: A case for STEM Outreach Center’s afterschool program. In R. Ferdig, E. Baumgartner, R. Hartshorne, R. Keplan-Rakowski, & C. Mouza (Eds.), Teaching, technology, and teacher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stories from the field (pp. 761-764). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). (z.umn.edu/emergency-closure-in-education)

NICHD. (2019). NICHD Study of early child care and youth development (SECCYD; historical/for reference only). Retrieved September 26, 2019 (https://nichd.nih.gov/research/supported/seccyd).

Pollack, J., Atkins-Burnett, S., Najarian, M., Rock, D. (2005). Early childhood longitudinal study, kindergarten class of 1998-99 (ECLS-K), Psychometric Report for Fifth Grade (NCES 2006-036). U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.

Ungar, M. (2011). Community resilience for youth and families: Facilitative physical and social capital in contexts of adversity. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(9), 1742-1748. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.04.027)

U.S. Department of Education (2004). Part B- 21st Century Community Learning Centers. (https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg55.html)

Downloads

Published

2021-12-14

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 5 (2021)

Section

Research & Evaluation Studies

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.