Seen and Heard: Learning from Young People's Experiences Sharing Power in Faith Communities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2021.1088

Keywords:

youth leadership, youth engagement, sharing power, faith communities, qualitative

Abstract

Faith communities have been shown to provide a sense of belonging and community while also providing a rich environment for youth to engage and grow as leaders. Yet, few current studies have explored faith communities as spaces for sharing power and sustained youth leadership development. Using a thematic analysis approach, this qualitative study of 222 participants across Jewish, Muslim, and Christian faith communities aimed to explore the role of developmental relationships in young people's lives and their faith and spiritual development. Through the analyses, multiple and varied examples of sharing power emerged, leading us to investigate more fully the roles of leadership, engagement, and participation in young people's experiences in their faith communities. Findings demonstrated that faith communities can provide welcoming, engaging spaces for youth to have voice and develop as leaders. Youth across faith communities experienced authentic opportunities to build and apply leadership skills. These experiences led to positive youth outcomes, including increased confidence, building relational skills, feelings of belonging, and greater engagement. Findings from this study can inform youth development programs more broadly by illuminating concrete ways adults and youth can share power, leading to young people’s sense of engagement and belonging.

Author Biography

Jenna Sethi, Search Institute

Jenna Sethi, Ph.D. Qualitative Research ScientistIndependent Research & Evaluation ConsultantAdjunct Faculty, Youth Studies, U of MN

References

Anderson, K. S., & Sandmann, L. (2009). Toward a model of empowering practices in youth-adult partnerships. Journal of Extension, 47(2), 1-8.

Armitage, J. S., & Dugan, R. E. (2006). Marginalized experiences of Hispanic females in youth‐based religious groups. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45(2), 217-231. (http://www.jstor.org/stable/3838314)

Balmer, R. (2007). Thy kingdom come: How the religious right distorts faith and threatens America. Basic Books.

Barber, B. L., Abbott, B. D., Neira, C. J. B., & Eccles, J. S. (2014). Meaningful activity participation and positive youth development. In M. J. Furlong, R. Gilman, E. S. Huebner (eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools (pp. 235-252). Routledge.

Brion-Meisels, G., Fei, J. T., & Vasudevan, D. S. (2020). At our best: Building youth-adult partnerships in out-of-school time settings. Information Age Publishing.

Bundick, M. J. (2011). Extracurricular activities, positive youth development, and the role of meaningfulness of engagement. Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(1), 57-74. (https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2010.536775)

Charmaz, K. (2008). Grounded theory as an emergent method. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (eds.), Handbook of Emergent Methods (pp. 155-172). Guilford Press.

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26(2), 120-123.

Costello J., Toles M., Spielberger J., & Wynn J. (2001). How history, ideology, and structure shape the organizations that shape youth. In P. L. Benson & K. J. Pittman (Eds.) Trends in youth development (Outreach Scholarship, vol. 6), (pp. 191-229). Springer. (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1459-6_7)

Dawes, N. P., & Larson, R. (2011). How youth get engaged: Grounded-theory research on motivational development in organized youth programs. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 259-269.

Derr, V. (2017). Participation as a supportive framework for cultural inclusion and environmental justice. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social (RIEJS), 6(1), 77-89. (https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2017.6.1.004)

Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. A. (Eds.) (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. National Academy Press.

Dessel, A. B., Jacobsen, J., Levy, D. L., McCarty-Caplan, D., Lewis, T. O., & Kaplan, L. E. (2017). LGBTQ topics and Christianity in social work: Tackling the tough questions. Social Work & Christianity, 44(1&2), 11-30.

Garza, P., Artman, S., & Roehlkepartain, E. C. (2007). Is there common ground? An exploratory study of the interests and needs of community-based and faith-based youth workers. National Collaboration for Youth and Search Institute.

Gates, H. L., Jr. (2021). The Black church: This is our story, this is our song. Penguin.

Grammich, C., Hadaway, K., Houseal, R., Jones, D. E., Krindatch, A., Stanley, R., & Taylor, R. H. (2010). U.S. religion census: Religious congregations & membership study. Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies.

Greene, K. M., Lee, B., Constance, N., & Hynes, K. (2013). Examining youth and program predictors of engagement in out-of-school time programs. Journal of youth and adolescence, 42(10), 1557-1572. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9814-3)

Hernez-Broome, G., & Hughes, R. J. (2004). Leadership development: Past, present, and future. Human Resource Planning, 27(1), 24-32.

Khan, L., Hewes, S., & Ali, R. (2009). Taking the lead: Youth leadership in theory and practice. The Young Foundation. (https://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Taking-the-Lead-October-2009.pdf)

Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55(1), 170-183. (https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.170)

Larson, R. W., Hansen, D. M., & Moneta, G. (2006). Differing profiles of developmental experiences across types of organized youth activities. Developmental Psychology, 42(5), 849–863. (https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.849)

MacNeil, C. A. (2006). Bridging generations: Applying “adult” leadership theories to youth leadership development. New Directions for Youth Development, 2006(109), 27-43.

Mahoney, J. L., & Vest, A. E. (2012). The over‐scheduling hypothesis revisited: Intensity of organized activity participation during adolescence and young adult outcomes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(3), 409-418.

Marsh, H., & Kleitman, S. (2002). Extracurricular school activities: The good, the bad, and the nonlinear. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4), 464-515. (https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.4.051388703v7v7736)

Mitha, K., & Adatia, S. (2016). The faith community and mental health resilience amongst Australian Ismaili Muslim youth. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 19(2), 192-207. (https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2016.1144732)

Mortensen, J., Lichty, L., Foster‐Fishman, P., Harfst, S., Hockin, S., Warsinske, K., & Abdullah, K. (2014). Leadership through a youth lens: Understanding youth conceptualizations of leadership. Journal of Community Psychology, 42(4), 447-462. (https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21620)

Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327-344. (https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305)

Redmond, S., & Dolan, P. (2016). Towards a conceptual model of youth leadership development. Child & Family Social Work, 21(3), 261-271. (https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12146)

Roehlkepartain, E. C. (2003). Building strengths, deepening faith: Understanding and enhancing youth development in Protestant congregations. In R. M. Lerner, F. Jacobs, & D. Wertlieb (Eds.), Handbook of applied developmental science. Promoting positive youth and family development (Vol. 3, pp. 515-534). Sage.

Scales, P. C., & Roehlkepartain, E. C. (2018). The contribution of nonfamily adults to adolescent well-being: A global research and policy perspective. In J. E. Lansford & P. Banati (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent development research and its impact on global policy (pp. 150-170). Oxford University Press. (https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190847128.001.0001)

Sullivan, T. S., Saito, R. N., & Chamberlain, R. (2018). Youth engagement, voice, and opportunities for decision-making. In P. A. Witt & L. L Caldwell (eds.), Youth development principles and practices in out-of-school time settings (2nd ed.), (pp. 431-461). Sagamore Publishing.

Theriault, D. (2018). A socio-historical overview of Black youth development in the United States for leisure studies. International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure, 1, 197–213. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s41978-018-0013-y)

Yohalem, N., & Martin, S. (2007). Building the evidence base for youth engagement: Reflections on youth and democracy. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(6), 807-810. (https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20180)

Downloads

Published

2021-12-14

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 5 (2021)

Section

Research & Evaluation Studies

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.