Sociopolitical Participation Among Marginalized Youth: Do Political Identification and Ideology Matter?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2021.1089

Keywords:

critical consciousness, marginalized youth, MIMIC models, sociopolitical development

Abstract

Engaging youth in the political system has promise for creating social change and ensuring the future of our democracy. Sociopolitical participation—individual and/or collective action to facilitate change—may be biased towards more liberal or Democratic views, which emphasize reform to create social equity. The aim of this study is to test if youth who vary in political ideology (i.e., conservative, liberal) and political identification (i.e., Republican, Democrat) participate at different levels and whether this measurement of sociopolitical participation is in fact biased. These issues were examined among 237 youth attending a large Midwestern high school who generally identified with historically marginalized groups. Results suggest that youth identifying as Republican exhibited slightly higher levels of participation, and that items were not biased by political ideology or identification. Further, political ideology and identification explained less than 5% of the variance in sociopolitical action, suggesting it is largely independent of political leaning.

Author Biography

Aixa D. Marchand, Rhodes College

Psychology & Educational Studies

Assistant Professor

References

Adler, R. P., & Goggin, J. (2005). What do we mean by “civic engagement”? Journal of Transformative Education, 3(3), 236-253. (https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344605276792)

Anyiwo, N., Bañales, J., Rowley, S. J., Watkins, D. C., & Richards-Schuster, K. (2018). Sociocultural influences on the sociopolitical development of African American youth. Child Development Perspectives. 12, 165-170. (https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12276)

Ballard, P. J. (2016). Longitudinal links between discrimination and civic development among Latino and Asian adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26, 723-737. (https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12221)

Beyerlein, K., & Hipp, J. R. (2006). From pews to participation: The effect of congregation activity and context on bridging civic engagement. Social Problems, 53(1), 97-117. (https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2006.53.1.97)

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

Cabrera, N. L., Milem, J. F., Jaquette, O., & Marx, R. W. (2014). Missing the (student achievement) forest for all the (political) trees: Empiricism and the Mexican American studies controversy in Tucson. American Educational Research Journal, 51(6), 1084-1118. (https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214553705)

Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (2019). Growing Voters: Engaging Youth Before They Reach Voting Age to Strengthen Democracy. (https://civicyouth.org/growing-voters-engaging-youth-before-they-reach-voting-age-to-strengthen-democracy/)

Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(1), 170-180. (https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014564)

DeAngelo, L., Schuster, M. T., & Stebleton, M. J. (2016). California DREAMers: Activism, identity, and empowerment among undocumented college students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 9(3), 216. (https://doi. org/10.1037/dhe0000023)

Diemer, M. A., & Li, C. H. (2011). Critical consciousness development and political participation among marginalized youth. Child Development, 82(6), 1815-1833. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01650.x)

Diemer, M. A., Mistry, R. S., Wadsworth, M. E., López, I., & Reimers, F. (2013). Best practices in conceptualizing and measuring social class in psychological research. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1),77-113. (https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12001)

Diemer, M. A., Pinedo, A., Bañales, J., Mathews, C. J., Frisby, M. B., Harris, E. M., & McAlister, S. (2021). Recentering action in critical consciousness. Child Development Perspectives, 15(1), 12-17. (https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12393)

Diemer, M. A., & Rapa, L. J. (2016). Unraveling the complexity of critical consciousness, political efficacy, and political action among marginalized adolescents. Child Development, 87(1), 221-238. (https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12446)

Diemer, M. A., Rapa, L. J., Park, C. J., & Perry, J. C. (2017). Development and validation of the critical consciousness scale. Youth & Society, 49(4), 461-483. (https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X14538289)

Diemer, M. A., Rapa, L. J., Voight, A. M., & McWhirter, E. H. (2016). Critical consciousness: A developmental approach to addressing marginalization and oppression. Child Development Perspectives, 10(4), 216-221. (https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12193)

Diemer, M. A., Voight, A. M., Marchand, A., & Bañales, J. (2019). Political identification, political ideology, and critical social analysis of inequality among marginalized youth. Developmental Psychology, 55(3), 538-549. (https://doi.org/11.1037/dev0000559)

Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8:3, 430- 457. (https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5)

Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton.

Flanagan, C. A. (2004). Volunteerism, leadership, political socialization, and civic engagement. In Lerner, R. M., & Steinberg, L. (Eds.). Handbook of Adolescent Psychology (721-746). Wiley.

Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.

Gaby, S. (2017). The civic engagement gap(s): Youth participation and inequality from 1976 to 2009. Youth & Society, 49(7), 923-946. (https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X16678155)

Ginwright, S. A. (2015). Radically healing Black lives: A love note to justice. New directions for student leadership, 2015(148), 33-44. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/yd.20151)

Hooghe, M., & Stolle, D. (2004). Good girls go to the polling booth, bad boys go everywhere: Gender differences in anticipated political participation among American fourteen‐year‐olds. Women, & Politics, 26(3-4), 1-23. (https://doi.org/10.1300/j014v26n03_01)

Hope, E. C., Gugwor, R., Riddick, K. N., & Pender, K. N. (2019). Engaged against the machine: Institutional and cultural racial discrimination and racial identity as predictors of activism orientation among Black youth. American Journal of Community Psychology, 63, 61-72. (https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12303)

Hope, E. C., Keels, M., & Durkee, M. I. (2016). Participation in Black Lives Matter and deferred action for childhood arrivals: Modern activism among Black and Latino college students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 9(3), 203. (https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000032)

Hope, E. C., & Spencer, M. B. (2017). Civic engagement as an adaptive coping response to conditions of inequality: An application of phenomenological variant of ecological systems theory (PVEST). In Handbook on positive development of minority children and youth (pp. 421-435). (http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-43645-6_25)

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1),1-55. (https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118)

Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge University Press.

Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R. G. (1968). The transmission of political values from parent to child. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 62(1), 169-184. (https://doi.org/10.2307/1953332)

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Methodology in the social sciences (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

Knight, K. (1999). Liberalism and conservatism. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of political attitudes (pp. 59-158). Academic Press.

Laurison, D. (2016). Social class and political engagement in the United States. Sociology Compass, 10(8), 684-697. (https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12390)

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2017). Mplus user's guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables, user's guide. Muthén & Muthén.

Ortega-Williams, A., Wernick, L. J., DeBower, J., & Brathwaite, B. (2020). Finding relief in action: The intersection of youth-led community organizing and mental health in Brooklyn, New York City. Youth & Society, 52(4), 618-638. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0044118X18758542)

Patterson, M. M., Bigler, R. S., Pahlke, E., Brown, C. S., Hayes, A. R., Ramirez, M. C., & Nelson, A. (2019). Toward a developmental science of politics. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 84(3), 7-185. (https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12410)

Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, H., Oswald, W., & Schulz, W. (2001).Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.

Walker, T. (2018, December 11). “Education is political”: Neutrality in the classroom shortchanges students. NEA, (https://www.nea.org/advocating-for-change/new-from-nea/education-political-neutrality-classroom-shortchanges-students)

Watts, R. J., Diemer, M. A., & Voight, A. M. (2011). Critical consciousness: Current status and future directions. New directions for child and adolescent development, 2011(134), 43-57. (https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.310)

Watts, R. J., & Flanagan, C. (2007). Pushing the envelope on youth civic engagement: A developmental and liberation psychology perspective. Journal of community psychology, 35(6), 779-792. (https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20178)

Watts, R. J., Griffith, D. M., & Abdul-Adil, J. (1999). Sociopolitical development as an antidote for oppression - Theory and action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27(2), 255-271. (https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022839818873)

Watts, R. J., Williams, N. C., & Jagers, R. J. (2003). Sociopolitical development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 185-194. (https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023091024140)

Whitley, C. T., & Yoder, S. D. (2015). Developing social responsibility and political engagement: Assessing the aggregate impacts of university civic engagement on associated attitudes and behaviors. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 10(3), 217-233. (https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197915583941)

Wray-Lake, L., Arruda, E. H., & Hopkins, D. A. (2019). The party goes on: US young adults’ partisanship and political engagement across age and historical time. American Politics Research, 57(6), 1358-1375. (https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X198449692)

Verba, S. (2003). Would the dream of political equality turn out to be a nightmare? Perspectives on Politics 1(4), 663-679. (https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592703000458)

Youniss, J., McLellan, J. A., & Yates, M. (1997). What we know about engendering civic identity. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 620-631. (https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764297040005008)

Downloads

Published

2021-12-14

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 5 (2021)

Section

Feature Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.