Latinx Adolescents’ Peer Ethnic Discrimination in After-School Activities and Activity Experiences

Authors

  • Ting-Lan Ma School of Liberal Arts, Education, and the Sciences; Edgewood College https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8349-6432
  • Mark Vincent B. Yu School of Education, University of California, Irvine
  • Stephanie Soto-Lara School of Education, University of California, Irvine
  • Sandra D. Simpkins School of Education, University of California, Irvine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2020.938

Keywords:

discrimination, Latinx youth, organized activities, after-school activities, extracurricular

Abstract

Grounded in ecological frameworks, this study examines (a) the extent to which Latinx adolescents’ perceptions of peer ethnic discrimination were associated with their participation in organized after-school activities, activity type, and ethnic composition; (b) different patterns of perceived peer ethnic discrimination; and (c) associations between discrimination patterns with key activity experiences including psychological engagement, perceived peer support, perceived leader support, and positive feelings in the activities. Using a pattern-centered approach, we applied latent profile analysis to analyze the data from 204 Latinx adolescents (53% female, M age = 12.40) in Southwest United States. Latinx adolescents who did not participate in organized after-school activities perceived higher peer ethnic discrimination than Latinx adolescents who participated. Latinx adolescents who were the numerical ethnic majority in activities reported lower discrimination than those who were the numerical minority. Among those who participated, 4 patterns of peer ethnic discrimination Latinx adolescents experienced in activities were identified. These profiles included moderate discrimination (4%), minimal discrimination (21%), no discrimination (64%), and somewhat negative beliefs (11%), which were differentially related to adolescents’ activity outcomes. Adolescents in the no discrimination group reported the most positive activity outcomes and those in the moderate discrimination group reported the most negative activity experiences. Adolescents who experienced little discrimination but felt other peers held negative beliefs about their ethnicity reported significantly lower psychological engagement and peer support than the no discrimination group. These findings highlight the importance of examining adolescents’ varying patterns of perceived ethnic discrimination in activities and provides ways that activity practitioners can optimize organized activity settings for Latinx adolescents.

References

Afterschool Alliance (2014). Taking a deeper dive into afterschool: Positive outcomes and promising practices. ERIC Clearinghouse.

Bejarano, C. L. (2005). ¿Qué onda? [What’s up?] Urban youth cultures and border identity. The University of Arizona Press.

Bellmore, A., Nishina, A., You, J. I., & Ma, T. L. (2012). School context protective factors against peer ethnic discrimination across the high school years. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49(1-2), 98-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-011-9443-0

Benner, A. D., & Graham, S. (2011). Latino adolescents’ experiences of discrimination across the first 2 years of high school: Correlates and influences on educational outcomes. Child development, 82(2), 508-519.

Benner, A. D., Wang, Y., Shen, Y., Boyle, A. E., Polk, R., & Cheng, Y. P. (2018). Racial/ethnic discrimination and well-being during adolescence: A meta-analytic review. American Psychologist, 73(7), 855-883. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000204

Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 993-1028). John Wiley & Sons.

Borden, L. M., Perkins, D. F., Villarruel, F. A., & Stone, M. R. (2005). To participate or not to participate: That is the question. New Directions for Youth Development, 2005(105), 33-49.

Brown, C., & Bigler, R. S. (2005). Children's perceptions of discrimination: A developmental model. Child Development, 76(3), 533-553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00862.x

Byrd, C. M., & Andrews, D. J. C. (2016). Variations in students' perceived reasons for, sources of, and forms of in-school discrimination: A latent class analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 57, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.05.001

Collins, L. M. and Lanza, S. T. (2010) Latent class and latent transition analysis: with applications in the social, behavioral and health sciences. Wiley.

Davalos, D. B., Chavez, E. L., & Guardiola, R. J. (1999). The effects of extracurricular activity, ethnic identification, and perception of school on student dropout rates. Hispanic Journal of behavioral sciences, 21(1), 61-77.

Dawes, N. P., & Larson, R. (2011). How youth get engaged: Grounded-theory research on motivational development in organized youth programs. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 259-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020729

DeGarmo, D. S., & Martinez C. R., Jr. (2006). A culturally informed model of academic well‐being for Latino youth: The importance of discriminatory experiences and social support. Family relations, 55(3), 267-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00401.x

Dworkin, J., & Larson, R. (2007). Adolescents’ negative experiences in organized youth activities. Journal of Youth Development, 1(3), 44-62. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2007.373

Echols, L., & Graham, S. (2018). Meeting in the Middle: The Role of Mutual Biracial Friends in Cross‐Race Friendships. Child development, 91(2). 401-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13179

Erbstein, N., & Fabionar, J. O. (2019). Supporting Latinx Youth Participation in Out-of-School Time Programs: A Research Synthesis. Afterschool Matters, 29, 17-27.

Ettekal, A. V., Gaskin, E. R., Lin, A. R., & Simpkins, S. D. (2015). “You gotta respect”: Mexican-origin adolescents’ perspectives on respect in organized activities. Journal of Youth Development, 10(3), 74-88.

Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. (2016). America’s children in brief: Key national indicators of well-being, 2016. U.S. Government Printing Office.

Fisher, C. B., Wallace, S. A., & Fenton, R. E. (2000). Discrimination distress during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29(6), 679-695. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026455906512

Fredricks, J. A., & Simpkins, S. D. (2013). Organized out‐of‐school activities and peer relationships: Theoretical perspectives and previous research. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2013(140), 1-17.

Garcia Coll, C. , Crnic, K., Lamberty, G., Wasik, B. H., Jenkins, R., Garcia, H. V., & McAdoo, H. P. (1996). An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child development, 67(5), 1891-1914.

Garnett, B. R., Masyn, K. E., Austin, S. B., Miller, M., Williams, D. R., & Viswanath, K. (2014). The intersectionality of discrimination attributes and bullying among youth: An applied latent class analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(8), 1225-1239.

Gast, M. J., Okamoto, D. G., & Feldman, V. (2017). “We only speak English here” English dominance in language diverse, immigrant after-school programs. Journal of Adolescent Research, 32(1), 94-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558416674562

Greene, M. L., Way, N., & Pahl, K. (2006). Trajectories of perceived adult and peer discrimination among Black, Latino, and Asian American adolescents: Patterns and psychological correlates. Developmental Psychology, 42(2), 218-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.2.218

Gutiérrez, V., Larson, R. W., Raffaelli, M., Fernandez, M., & Guzman, S. (2017). How staff of youth programs respond to culture-related incidents: Nonengagement versus going “full-right-in”. Journal of Adolescent Research, 32(1), 64-93.

Hurd, N., & Deutsch, N. (2017). SEL-focused after-school programs. The Future of Children, 27(1), 95-115.

Huynh, V. W., & Fuligni, A. J. (2010). Discrimination hurts: The academic, psychological, and physical well‐being of adolescents. Journal of Research on adolescence, 20(4), 916-941.

Johnston, K. E., & Delgado, M. Y. (2004). Mexican American adolescents’ experiences with ethnic discrimination. Poster session presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Baltimore, MD.

Knifsend, C. A., Camacho-Thompson, D. E., Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (2018). Friends in activities, school-related affect, and academic outcomes in diverse middle schools. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(6), 1208-1220.

Knight, G. P., Roosa, M. W., & Umaña-Taylor, A. J. (2009). Studying ethnic minority and economically disadvantaged populations: Methodological challenges and best practices. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11887-000

Lee, R. T., Perez, A. D., Boykin, C. M., Mendoza-Denton, R. (2019). On the prevalence of racial discrimination in the United States. PLOS ONE, 14(1): e0210698. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210698

Lerner, R. M., Wang, J., Hershberg, R. M., Buckingham, M. H., Harris, E. M., Tirrell, J. M., Bowers, E. P., & Lerner, J. V. (2017). Positive youth development among minority youth: A relational developmental systems model. In Handbook on positive development of minority children and youth (pp. 5-17). Springer.

Lin, A. R., Menjívar, C., Vest Ettekal, A., Simpkins, S. D., Gaskin, E. R., & Pesch, A. (2016). “They will post a law about playing soccer” and other ethnic/racial microaggressions in organized activities experienced by Mexican-origin families. Journal of Adolescent Research, 31(5), 557-581.

Lorenzo-Blanco, E. I., Unger, J. B., Oshri, A., Baezconde-Garbanati, L., & Soto, D. (2016). Profiles of bullying victimization, discrimination, social support, and school safety: Links with Latino/a youth acculturation, gender, depressive symptoms, and cigarette use. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 86(1), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000113

Mahoney, J. L., Vandell, D. L., Simpkins, S., & Zarrett, N. (2009). Adolescent out-of-school activities. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Contextual influences on adolescent development (p. 228–269). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy002008

Moore, E. W. G., & Hansen, D. (2012). Construct-validity of the engagement with challenge measure for adolescents: Structural- and criterion-validity evidence. Psychology, 3, 923-933. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2012.310139

National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Federal programs for education and related activities. In The condition of education 2015 (chap. 2). https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015144.pdf

Ngo, B. (2017). Naming their world in a culturally responsive space: Experiences of Hmong adolescents in an after-school theatre program. Journal of Adolescent Research, 32(1), 37-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558416675233

Nishina, A., & Bellmore, A. (2010). When might peer aggression, victimization, and conflict have its largest impact? Microcontextual considerations. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431609350928

Niwa, E. Y., Way, N., & Hughes, D. L. (2014). Trajectories of ethnic‐racial discrimination among ethnically diverse early adolescents: Associations with psychological and social adjustment. Child Development, 85(6), 2339-2354. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12310

Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural equation modeling: A multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535-569.

Nylund, K., Bellmore, A., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2007). Subtypes, severity, and structural stability of peer victimization: What does latent class analysis say? Child development, 78(6), 1706-1722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01097.x

Okamoto, D., Gast, M., & Feldman, V. (2012, August). Managing diversity in youth-serving organizations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Denver, CO.

Rosenthal, R., & Vandell, D. L. (1996). Quality of care at school-aged child-care programs: Regulatable features, observed experiences, child perspectives, and parent perspectives. Child Development, 67, 2434-2445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01866.x

Schaefer, D. R., Simpkins, S. D., Vest, A. E., & Price, C. D. (2011). The Contribution of Extracurricular Activities to Adolescent Friendships: New Insights Through Social Network Analysis. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1141-1152. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024091

Seaton, E. K., & Yip, T. (2009). School and neighborhood contexts, perceptions of racial discrimination, and psychological well-being among African American adolescents. Journal of youth and adolescence, 38(2), 153-163.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-15

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 6 (2020)

Section

Program & Practice Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.