Exploring the 4-H Thriving Model: A Commentary Through an Equity Lens

Authors

  • Nia Imani Fields University of Maryland Extension 4-H Youth Development

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2020.1058

Keywords:

positive youth development, diversity, equity

Abstract

Many youth-serving organizations across the nation have made commitments to enhance their ability to better engage diverse communities with equity and inclusion at the fore. For many youth programs, there is a need to better align youth, adult leaders, and curriculum with the diverse needs and social conditions of the country. In their article, Professors Arnold and Gagnon describe the most recent iteration of a theory of change for 4-H, a national youth-serving organization that offers a variety of PYD programs. 4‑H recognizes the critical need to reach the most marginalized communities, yet the opportunity gap that exists in its programming cannot be fully addressed if an equity lens is not applied to the systematic analysis and delivery of programs. In this commentary, I critique the 4-H Thriving Model through an equity lens and, in doing so, explain the key terms and theories necessary for stakeholders to understand in order to promote equity in the youth sector.

References

American Evaluation Association. (2017). American Evaluation Association Statement on Cultural Competence. In Evaluation. http://www.eval.org/p/cm/ld/fid=92

Arnold, M. E. (2018). From context to outcomes: A thriving model for 4-H youth development programs. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension,6(1), 141-159.

Arnold, M. E., & Gagnon, R. J. (2019). Illuminating the process of youth development: The mediating effect of thriving on youth development program outcomes. Journal of Humans Sciences and Extension, 7(3), 24-51.

Arnold, M. E., & Gagnon, R. J. (2020). Positive youth development theory in practice: An update on the 4 H Thriving Model. Journal of Youth Development, 15(6), xx-yy. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2020.954

Baltimore Racial Justice Action. (2016). Baltimore Racial Justice Action: Definitions. http://bmoreantiracist.org/resources-2/explanations/

Benson, P. L. (2003). Developmental assets and asset-building community: Conceptual and empirical foundations. In R. M. Lerner & P. L. Benson (Eds.). Developmental assets and asset-building communities: Implications for research, policy, and practice (pp. 19-43). Kluwer.

Benson, P. L., & Scales, P. C. (2009). The definition and preliminary measurement of thriving in adolescence. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(1), 85–104.

Benson, P. L., & Scales, P. C. (2011). Thriving and sparks. In R. J. R. Leveque (Ed.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 2963–2976). Springer.

Breunig, M. (2005). Turning experiential education and critical pedagogy theory into praxis. Journal of Experiential Education, 28(2), 106-122.

Brown, K. (2004). Leadership for social justice and equity: Weaving a transformative framework and pedagogy. Educational administration quarterly, 40(1) 77-108.

Calhoun, C. (Ed) (2002): Dictionary of the social sciences. Oxford University Press.

Chazdon, S., Allen, R. P., Horntvedt, J., & & Scheffert, D. R. (2013). Reflecting (on) social capital: Development and validation of a community-based social capital assessment (Unpublished manuscript), University of Minnesota Extension.

Damon, W. (2004). What is positive youth development? American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203260092

Deen, M., Parker, l., & Huskey M. (2015). Navigating difference cultural awareness notebook. Washington State University Extension Publishing.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience & education. Simon and Schuster.

Diversity. (n.d.). Merriam-Webster.com. Retrieved December 10, 2019, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/diversity

Eccles, J., & Gootman, J. (Eds.). (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. National Academy Press.

Extension Committee on Organization and Policy 4-H. (2019). 4-H Opportunity statement. Author.

Erbstein, N. (2013). Engaging underrepresented youth populations in community youth development: Tapping social capital as a critical resource. . In M. Calvert, M. Emery, & S. Kinsey (Eds.), New directions for youth development (pp. 109-124). Wiley.

Fields, N. (2016). The contribution of urban 4-H positive youth development towards social capital and social justice. Morgan State University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 10240078.

Fields, N. (2017). The contribution of urban 4-H to social capital and the implications for social justice. Journal of Extension, 55(6). https://joe.org/joe/2017december/a1.php

Fields, N. (2019). Increasing cultural awareness & equity in Extension programs. https://campus.extension.org/enrol/index.php?id=1658

Fields, N., & Moncloa, F. (2018). Are your programs culturally relevant? Poster session presented at National 4-H Association of Extension 4-H Agents, Columbus, Ohio.

Fields, N., Moncloa, F., & Smith, C. (2018). 4-H social justice youth development: A guide for youth development professionals. National 4-H Curriculum.

Fields, N., & Nathaniel, K. (2015). Our role in and responsibility toward social justice. Journal of Extension, 53(5). https://www.joe.org/joe/2015october/comm2.php

Freire, P. (1970/2012). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury Academic.

Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research and practice (2nd edition). Teachers College Press.

Ginwright, S., & Cammarota, J. (2002). New terrain in youth development: The promise of a social justice approach. Social justice, 29(4), 82-95. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29768150

Ginwright, S., & James, T. (2002). From asserts to agents of change: Social justice, organizing, and youth development.. In B. Kirshner, J. O'Donoghue & M. McLaughlin (Eds.), New directions for youth development (pp. 27-46). Wiley.

Giroux, H. A. (1983). Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 53(3), 257–293.

Interaction Institute for Social Change & Maguire, A. (2016). Illustrating equality vs equity (image). http://interactioninstitute.org/illustrating-equality-vs-equity/

Kutner, P. (2016). The problem with that equity vs. equality graphic you’re using. http://culturalorganizing.org/the-problem-with-that-equity-vs-equality-graphic/

Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teaching for African American students. Jossey-Bass.

Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice 3(34), 160-165.

Ladson-Billings, G. (2000). Racialized discourses and ethnic epistemologies. N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd edition). Sage.

Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. The Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3-12.

Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: a.k.a. the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74-84. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751

Larson, R., & Ngo, B. (2017). Introduction to special issue: The importance of culture in youth programs. Journal of Adolescent Research , 32(1), 3-10.

Lerner, R. M. (2005, September). Promoting positive youth development: Theoretical and empirical bases. White paper prepared for the workshop on the science of adolescent health and development, National Research Council/Institute of Medicine. National Academics of Science.

Lerner, R. M. (2007). The good teen: Rescuing adolescence from the myths of the storms and stress years. Stonesong Press.

Lerner, R. M., Dowling, E. M., & Anderson, P. M. (2003). Positive youth development: Thriving as the basis of personhood and civil society. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0703_8

Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J. B., Theokas, C., Phelps, E., Gettsdottir, S., Naudeau, S. Jelicic, H., Alberts, A., Ma, L., Smith, L. M., Bobek, D. L., Richman-Raphael, D., Simpson, I., Christiansens, E. D., & von Eye, A. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth-grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H study of positive youth development. Journal of Early Adolesence, 25(1), 17-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431604272461

Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., von Eye, A., Bowers, E. P., & Lewin-Bizan, S. (2011). Individual and contextual bases of thriving in adolescence: A view of the issues. Journal of Adolescence, 34(6), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.08.001

Martin, J. (2008). Pedagogy of the alienated: Can Freirian teaching reach working-class students? Equity & Excellence in Education, 41(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680701773776

McLaren, P. (1997/2010). Critical pedagogy. Teaching Education, 9(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047621970090101

Multi-State Research Project NCERA215. (2015). Contribution of 4-H participation to the development of social capital within communities project overview. http://ucanr.edu/sites/Social_Capital_Multi-State/

Niblett, B. (2017). Social justice education: Stories and strategies for teachers. Woods N Barnes Publishing.

Pawson, R. (2013). The science of evaluation: A realist manifesto. Sage.

Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Sage.

Perry, T., Steele, C., & Hilliard III, A. (2003) Young, gifted and black: Promoting high achievement among African-American students. Beacon Press.

Rose, J., & Paisley, K. (2012). White privilege in experiential education: A critical reflection. Leisure Sciences, 34(2), 136-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2012.652505

Roth, J. L., Malone, L. M., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2010). Does the amount of participation in afterschool programs relate to developmental outcomes? A review of the literature. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3-4), 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9303-3

Search Institute. (2014). The Search Institute model of thriving orientation: Overview of its evolution through recent funding from the Thrive Foundation for Youth (Unpublished paper). Author.

Sensoy, O., & DiAngelo, R. (2012). Is everyone equal? J.A. Banks (Ed.). Teachers College Press.

Spencer, M. (2008). Lessons learned and opportunities ignored since Brown v. Board of education: Youth development and the myth of a color-blind society. Educational Researcher, 37(5), 253-266.

Theokas, C., Almerigi, J. B., Lerner, R. M., Dowling, E. M., Benson, P. L., Scales, P. C., & von Eye, A. (2005). Conceptualizing and modeling individual and ecological asset components of thriving in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 113–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431604272460

University of Washington Tacoma Diversity Resource Center. (2015). Diversity and social justice glossary. https://www.tacoma.uw.edu/sites/default/files/sections/Diversity/diversity_glossary.pdf.pdf

Weiss, H. B., Little, P. M. D., & Bouffard, S. M. (2005). More than just being there: Balancing the participation equation. New Directions for Youth Development, 105, 15-31.

Williams, B. (2001). Accomplishing cross cultural competence in youth development programs. Journal of Extension, 39(6). https://www.joe.org/joe/2001december/iw1.php

YMCA of the USA. (2017). Diversity Wheel. https://ymca-snoco.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Diversity-Wheel.pdf

Yosso, T. (2006). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006

Downloads

Published

2020-12-15

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 6 (2020)

Section

Forum

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.