From Model to Reality: The Role of Implementation Readiness

Authors

  • Deborah A. Moroney American Institutes for Research

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2020.1057

Keywords:

positive youth development, implementation science, program readiness, capacity

Abstract

Arnold and Gagnon’s timely work on the 4-H Thriving Model is an excellent example of the application of developmental science in youth development practice. In their article, the authors describe how 4-H, an established youth development organization, updated the theory of change. Designing an actionable theory of change based on science is indeed a commendable effort for any youth-serving organization. However, the work does not stop there. The diverse 4-H system now has the ultimate challenge of adopting and implementing the principles presented in their theory of change. In this commentary, I discuss the often-overlooked components of implementation readiness: motivation, general capacity, and content-specific knowledge (R=MC2) in relation to the 4-H Thriving Model.  When staff are ready, they can succeed in aligning resources and coordinate professional learning for the adults, or implementers, to know and understand the theory of change and associated practices. Fostering learning and development to enact science-informed strategies, as Arnold and Gagnon have done in the 4-H Thriving Model, is critical to developing sound models of youth programming. However, to implement a model into practice, the real and human factors of implementation readiness are key to success.

References

Afterschool Alliance. (2020). Afterschool Alliance COVID-19 tracking program provider survey. Afterschool Alliance. http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/documents/Afterschool-COVID-19-Wave-1-Wave-2-Provider-Comparison-Toplines.pdf

Anyon, Y., Roscoe, J., Bender, K., Kennedy, H., Dechats, J., Begun, S., & Gallger, C. (2019). Reconciling adaption and fidelity: Implications for scaling up high quality youth programs. Journal of Primary Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-019-00535-6

Arnold, M. E. (2018). From context to outcomes: A thriving model for 4-H youth development programs. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 6(1), 141-160.

Arnold, M. E., & Gagnon, R. J. (2020). Positive youth development theory in practice: An update on the 4-H Thriving Model. Journal of Youth Development 15(6), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2020.954

Bornstein, M. H. (2019). Fostering optimal development and averting detrimental development: Prescriptions, proscriptions and specificity. Journal of Applied Developmental Science, 23(4), 340–345.

Cantor, P., Osher, D., Berg, J., Steyer, L., & Rose, T. (2019). Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context. Applied Developmental Science, 23(4), 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2017.1398649

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2019). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Durlak, J. (2016). What you HAVE to know about program implementation. Paper presented at the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Workshop on Approaches to the Development of Character, Washington, D.C.

Dymnicki, A., Wandersman, A., Osher, D., Grigorescu, V., & Huang, L. (2014). Willing, able  ready: Basics and policy implications of readiness as a key component for implementation of evidence-based interventions. Executive summary. https://youth.gov/docs/Readiness_IssueBrief_508.pdf

-H. (2020). 4-H at home. 4-H. https://4-h.org/about/4-h-at-home/

Ham, H. (2020). Skilled professionals, not superheroes. National Afterschool Association. https://naaweb.org/professional-development/item/1342-skilled-professionals-not-superheroes

Lerner, R. M., & Lerner, J. V. (2013). The Positive development of youth: Comprehensive findings from the 4-H study of positive youth development. Institute for Applied Research in Youth Development at Tufts University. https://4-h.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/4-H-Study-of-Positive-Youth-Development-Full-Report.pdf

Morel, R. P., Coburn, C., Catterson, A. K., & Higgs, J. (2019). The multiple meanings of scale: Implications for researchers and practitioners. Educational Researcher, 48(6), 369–377.

Moroney, D. (2016). Ready to implement? How the out-of-school time workforce can support character development through social and emotional learning: A review of the literature and future directions. Paper presented at the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Workshop on Approaches to the Development of Character, Washington, D.C.

Moroney, D., & Devaney, E. (2017). Ready to implement? How the out-of-school time workforce can support character development through social and emotional learning: A review of the literature and future directions. Journal of Character Education, 13(1), 67–89.

Moroney, D., & Young, J. (2019). The science of learning and development in afterschool settings and systems. American Institutes for Research.

Osher, D., Cantor, P., Berg, J., Steyer, L., & Rose, T. (2019). Drivers of human development: How relationships and context shape learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2017.1398650

Osher, D., Pittman, K., Young, J., Smith, H., Moroney, D., & Irby, M. (2020). Thriving, robust equity, and transformative learning & development: A more powerful conceptualization of the contributors to youth success. Forum for Youth Investment.

Scaccia, J. P., Cook, B. S., Lamont, A., Wandersman, A., Castellow, J., Katz, J., & Beidas, R. (2015). A practical implementation science heuristic for organizational readiness: R=MC2. Journal of Community Psychology, 43(4), 484–501.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-15

Issue

Section

Forum