A Comparative Examination of How Program Design Components Influence Youth Leadership-Skill Development

Authors

  • Samantha Bates Texas Christian University, Department of Social Work http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0915-5709
  • Dawn Anderson-Butcher The Ohio State University, College of Social Work
  • Theresa Ferrari Ohio 4-H Youth Development, Ohio State University Extension
  • Christy Clary Ohio 4-H Youth Development, Ohio State University Extension

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2020.868

Keywords:

youth leadership, program design, skill development, high school

Abstract

A growing interest in how adolescents can prepare for the workforce has contributed to the development of positive youth development (PYD) programs focused on youth leadership. This study explored what mechanisms and design components support leadership skill development among youth participating in 3 different PYD leadership programs. All of these programs involve high school students, have a focus on leadership, and emphasize college and workforce readiness. The aims of the study were to (a) examine what commonalities and differences in program design components contribute to skill development, (b) identify what leadership skills youth develop by participating in PYD leadership programs, and (c) explore what underlying mechanisms youth perceive contribute to their skill development over time. A total of 3 focus groups were conducted, each lasting 90 minutes, with a total of 18 youth (i.e., 6 youth per program). Nvivo, a qualitative software, and thematic analysis were used to distill common and differential themes related to the program design components the participants recognized as integral parts of the programs that contributed to their leadership skill development. Common skills developed across all 3 programs included working in groups, public speaking, and problem solving, yet differences in skills were also reported and linked to differences in program design. Additional findings showed several underlying mechanisms supported leadership skill development among youth participants. Findings can inform the development of effective youth leadership PYD programs, thereby further supporting youth in achieving their goals; avoiding harmful behaviors; and developing the competencies, confidence, and values youth need to successfully transition to adulthood. 

References

America’s Promise Alliance. (2020). The five promises: Caring adults. https://www.americaspromise.org/promise/caring-adults

Akiva, T., Cortina, K. S., Eccles, J. S., & Smith, C. (2013). Youth belonging and cognitive engagement in organized activities: A large-scale field study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 208-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2013.05.0

Akiva, T., Cortina, K. S., & Smith, C. (2014). Involving youth in program decision-making: How common and what might it do for youth? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1844-1860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0183-y

Albright, M. D., & Ferrari, T. M. (2010). “Push” and “pull”: A qualitative study of factors that contribute to older youth leaving the 4-H program. Journal of Youth Development, 5(3), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2010.209

Anyon, Y., Bender, K., Kennedy, H., & Dechants, J. (2018). A systematic review of youth participatory action research (YPAR) in the United States: Methodologies, youth outcomes, and future directions. Health Education and Behavior, 45(6), 865-878. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198118769357

Bates, S., Anderson-Butcher, D., Niewoehner-Green, J., & Provenzano, J. (2019). Exploration of a college and career readiness leadership program for urban youth. Journal of Youth Development, 14(3), 160-182. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2019.664

Bean, C., Harlow, M., & Kendellen, K. (2017). Strategies for fostering basic psychological needs support in high quality youth leadership programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 61, 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.12.003

Blanchet-Cohen, N., & Brunson, L. (2014). Creating settings for youth empowerment and leadership: An ecological perspective. Child & Youth Services, 35(3), 216-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/0145935X.2014.938735

Branquinho, C., Tomé, G., Grothausen, T., & Gaspar de Matos, M. (2020). Community-based youth participatory action research studies with a focus on youth health and well-being: A systematic review. Journal of Community Psychology, 48, 1301-1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22320

Buehler, K., Sánchez, B., Vaclavik, D., Rodriguez, & Gray, T. (2020). Rules of disengagement: Negative relationships and interactions between adults and youth. Youth & Society, 52(6), 1033-1056. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X18793157

Burrus, J., Jackson, T., Xi, N., & Steinberg, J. (2013). Identifying the most important 21st century workforce competencies: An analysis of the Occupational Information Network (O*NET). ETS Research Report Series [ETS-RR-13-21]. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2013.tb02328.x/epdf

Cascio, M. A., Lee, E., Vaudrin, N., & Freedman, D. A. (2019). A team-based approach to open coding: Considerations for creating intercoder consensus. Field Methods, 21(2), 116-130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X19838237

Casner-Lotto, J., & Barrington, L. (2006). Are they really ready to work? Employers’ perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st century U.S. workforce. Conference Board. http://www.conferenceboard.org/pdf_free/BED-06-Workforce.pdf

Cater, M., Machtmes, K., & Fox, J. E. (2013). A phenomenological examination of context on adolescent ownership and engagement rationale. The Qualitative Report, 18, Article 31, 1-13. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR18/cater31.pdf

Ciocanel, O., Power, K., Eriksen, A., & Gillings, K. (2017). Effectiveness of positive youth development interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 483-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0555-6

Cochran, G., & Ferrari, T. M. (2009). Preparing youth for the 21st century knowledge economy: Youth programs and workforce preparation. Afterschool Matters, 8, 11-25. http://www.robertbownefoundation.org/pdf_files/2009_asm_spring.pdf

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593

Dawes, N. P., & Larson, R. W. (2011). How youth get engaged: Grounded-theory research on motivational development in organized youth programs. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 259-269. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020729

de Brey, C., Musu, L., McFarland, J., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., Diliberti, M., Zhang, A., Branstetter, C., & Wang, X. (2019). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups 2018 (NCES 2019-038). National Center for Education Statistics. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED592833

Deming, D. J. (2017). The growing importance of social skills in the labor market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(4), 1593–1640. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx022

Duerden, M. D., & Gillard, A. (2011). An approach to theory-based youth programming. New Directions for Youth Development, S1, 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.418

Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0

Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., & Pachan, M. (2010). A meta‐analysis of after‐school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3-4), 294-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9300-6

Dworkin, J., & Larson, R. (2007). Adolescents’ negative experience sin organized youth activities. Journal of Youth Development, 1(3), 44-62. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2007.373

Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. National Academies Press.

Ferrari, T. M., Arnett, N., & Cochran, G. (2008). Preparing teens for success: Building 21st century skills through a 4-H work-based learning program. Journal of Youth Development, 3(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2008.317

Ferrari, T. M., Lekies, K. S., & Arnett, N. (2009). Opportunities matter: Exploring youths’ perspectives on their long-term participation in an urban 4-H youth development program. Journal of Youth Development, 4(3), 22-40. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2009.249

Ferrari, T. M., & Risch, L. S. (2013). Exploring 4-H camp counseling as a context for developing responsibility. Abstract of a presentation at the American Camp Association Camp Research Symposium, Dallas, TX. Retrieved from http://www.acacamps.org/research/connect/research-symposiums

Grossman, J. B., & Bulle, M. J. (2006). Review of what youth programs do to increase the connectedness of youth with adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 788-799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.08.004

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Sage.

Guest, G., Namey, E., & McKenna, K. (2017). How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes. Field Methods, 29(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X16639015

Hamilton, S. F., Hamilton, M. A., & Pittman, K. (2004). Principles for youth development. In S. F. Hamilton & M. A. Hamilton (Eds.), The youth development handbook: Coming of age in American communities (pp. 3-22). Sage.

Harrington, R., Sheehan, T., & Blyth, D. (2011). Examining the reasons and relationships between why youth join, stay in, and leave 4-H. Journal of Youth Development, 6(2), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2011.186

Jones, J. N., & Deutsch, N. L. (2011). Relational strategies in after-school settings: How staff–youth relationships support positive development. Youth & Society, 43(4), 1381–1406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X10386077

Kelsey, K. D. (2020). The sharpening stone: A phenomenological study of the impact of a 4-H state-level leadership role on youth leadership and life skills development. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 8(1), 1-16. https://www.jhseonline.com/article/view/997

Kelsey, K. D., & Fuhrman, N. E. (2020). Leadership and life skills development among 4-H state-level youth leaders. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 8(2), 15-27. https://www.jhseonline.com/article/view/1049

Kirschner, B., & Ginwright, S. (2012). Youth organizing as a developmental context for African American and Latino adolescents. Child Development Perspectives, 6(3), 288-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00243.x

Kress, C. A. (2006). Youth leadership and youth development: Connections and questions. New Directions for Youth Development, 109, 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.154

Lakin, R., & Mahoney, A. (2006). Empowering youth to change their world: Identifying key components of a community service program to promote positive development. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 513-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.06.001

Larson, R. W. (2011). Positive development in a disorderly world. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(2), 317-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00707.x

Larson, R. W., & Angus, R. (2011). Pursuing paradox: The role of adults in creating empowering settings for youth. In M. Aber, K. Maton, & E. Seidman (Eds.), Empowering settings and voices for social change (pp. 65-93). Oxford University Press.

Lerner, R. M., Alberts, A. E., Jelicic, H., & Smith, L. M. (2006). Young people as resources to be developed: Promoting positive youth development through adult-youth relations and community assets. In E. G. Clary & J. E. Rhodes (Eds.), Mobilizing adults for positive youth development: Strategies for closing the gap between beliefs and behaviors (pp. 19-39). Springer.

Lerner, R. M., Wang, J., Chase, P. A., Gutierrez, A. S., Harris, E. M., Rubin, R. O., & Yalin, C. (2014). Using relational developmental systems theory to link program goals, activities, and outcomes: The case of the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. New Directions for Youth Development, 144, 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20110

Lippman, L. H., Ryberg, R., Carney, R., & Moore, K. A. (2015). Workforce connections: Key “soft skills” that foster youth workforce success: Toward a consensus across fields. Child Trends. https://www.childtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/2015-24WFCSoftSkills1.pdf

Liu, Z., Venkatesh, S., Murphy, S. E., & Riggio, R. E. (2020). Leader development across the lifespan: A dynamic experiences-grounded approach. The Leadership Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101382

MacNeil, C. A., & McClean, J. (2006). Moving from “youth leadership development” to “youth in governance”: Learning leadership by doing leadership. New Directions for Youth Development, 109, 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.157

Moran, L., Bunch, J. C., & Cater, M. (2019). 4-H state leadership boards: Measuring leadership life skills and youth-adult relationships. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 7(1), 68-78. https://www.jhseonline.com/article/view/807

Mueller, M. K., Phelps, E., Bowers, E. P., Agans, J. P., Urban, J. B., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). Youth development program participation and intentional self-regulation skills: Contextual and individual bases of pathways to positive youth development. Journal of Adolescence, 34(6), 1115-1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.07.010

Ozer, E. J. (2017). Youth-led participatory action research: Overview and potential for enhancing adolescent development. Child Development Perspectives, 11(3), 173-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12228

Parkhill, A., Deans, C. L., & Chapin, L. A. (2018). Pre-leadership processes in leadership training for adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 88, 375-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.033

Ramey. H. L. (2013). Organizational outcomes of youth involvement in organizational decision making: A synthesis of qualitative research. Journal of Community Psychology, 41(4), 488-504. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21553

Redmond, S., & Dolan, P. (2016). Toward a conceptual model of youth leadership development. Child & Family Social Work, 21, 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12146

Roth, J. L., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2016). Evaluating youth development programs: Progress and promise. Applied Developmental Science, 20(3), 188-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2015.1113879

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.

Serido, J., Borden, L. M., & Perkins, D. F. (2011). Moving beyond youth voice. Youth & Society, 43(1), 44-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X09351280

Smith, C., Akiva, T., Arrieux, D., & Jones, M. M. (2006). Improving quality at the point of service. New Directions for Youth Development, 112, 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.195

Spencer, R., & Rhodes, J. E. (2014). Growth-promoting relationships with children and youth. New Directions for Youth Development, 144, 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20113

Stewart, D. W., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2007). Focus groups: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Sage.

Subramaniam, A., & Moncloa, F. (2010). Young people's perspectives on creating a “participation-friendly” culture. Children, Youth and Environments, 20(2), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.20.2.0025

Suleiman, A. B., Ballard, P. J., Hoyt, L. T., & Ozer, E. J. (2019). Applying a developmental lens to youth-led participatory action research: A critical examination and integration of existing evidence. Youth & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X19837871

Thomas, J., Larson, M., Solberg, V. S., & Martin, J. (2017). Providing quality career development within youth development & leadership programs (Issue 45). National Collaborative on Workforce and Disability for Youth. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED585183

Walker, K. C. (2011). The multiple roles that youth development program leaders adopt with youth. Youth & Society, 43(2), 635–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X10364346

Walker, J., Marczak, M., Blyth, D., & Borden, L. (2005). Designing youth development programs: Toward a theory of developmental intentionality. In J. L. Mahoney, R. W. Larson, & J. S. Eccles (Eds). Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs (pp. 399-418). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Witt, P. A., & Caldwell, L. L. (Eds.) (2018). Youth development: Principles and practices in out-of-school time settings (2nd ed.). Sagamore Venture Publishing.

Yohalem, N., & Wilson-Ahlstrom, A. (2010). Inside the black box: Assessing and improving quality in youth programs. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3-4), 350-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9311-3

Youth Speak Out Coalition, & Zimmerman, K. (2007). Making space, making change: Models for youth-led social change organizations. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(2), 298-314. https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.17.2.0298

Downloads

Published

2020-12-15

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 6 (2020)

Section

Feature Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.