Linking Experiential Workshops and Increased STEM Interest Among First- and Second-Generation Latino Youth

Authors

  • Jeff Sallee Oklahoma State University 4-H Youth Development
  • Ronald B. Cox Oklahoma State University
  • Rita Flores Oklahoma State University
  • Steven R. Cooper Oklahoma State University
  • Belinda I. Gomez U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research
  • Craig A. Gifford New Mexico State University
  • Jennifer A. Hernandez-Gifford New Mexico State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2019.581

Keywords:

STEM, latino, hispanic, animal science, biotechnology, digital media

Abstract

Extension outreach professionals are searching for new methods to target the growing population of Latino students. Oklahoma State University faculty in the Animal Science department and the 4-H Youth Development program partnered to sponsor a 4-H STEM Institute designed to promote science, technology, engineering, and math to Latino students in the Unidos Se Puede program. The STEM Institute was designed to introduce the Latino youth to college life and STEM based career opportunities. The program was evaluated utilizing the 4-H Common Measures Science instruments. The results indicate a positive impact on the youth’s perception of STEM as a career option. The students increase in self-efficacy predicts the students will increase their persistence in the subjects of science and math (Simpkins, Davis-Kean, & Eccles, 2006). Increased persistence in science and math leads to increased success in post secondary STEM studies and occupations.

References

Alexander, J. D., Cox Jr, R. B., Behnke, A., & Larzelere, R. E. (2017). Is all parental “noninvolvement” equal? Barriers to involvement and their relationship to Latino academic achievement. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 39(2), 169-179. doi:10.1177/0739986317700837

Arbona, C., & Nora, A. (2007). The influence of academic and environmental factors on Hispanic degree attainment. The Review of Higher Education, 30(3), 247-269.

Archer, L., Dewitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617-639. doi:10.1002/sce.20399

Archer, L., Hollingworth, S., & Halsall, A. (2007). “University is not for me—I’m a Nike person”: Urban, working-class young people’s negotiations of “style,” identity and educational engagement. Sociology, 41(2), 219-237. doi:10.1177/0038038507074798

Atkinson, R. D. & Mayo, M. J. (2011). Refueling the US innovation economy: Fresh approaches to science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Washington, D.C. Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF), (pp 24-40). Retrieved September 1, 2012, from http://www.itif.org/files/2010-refueling-innovation-economy.pdf

Cole, D., & Espinoza, A. (2008). Examining the academic success of Latino students in science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Student Development, 49(4), 285-300.

Cooper, C. R. (2011). Bridging multiple worlds: Cultures, identities, and pathways to college. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Cox, R. B., Jr. (2017). Promoting Resilience with the¡ Unidos Se Puede! Program: An Example of Translational Research for Latino Families. Family Relations, 66(4), 712-728. doi:10.1111/fare.12265

Crisp, G., & Nora, A. (2012). Overview of Hispanics in science, mathematics, engineering and technology (STEM): K-16 representation, preparation and participation. Retrieved from Hispanic Association of Colleges and University website: http://www.hacu.net/images/hacu/OPAI/H3ERC/2012_papers/Crisp%20nora%20-%20hispanics%20in%20stem%20-%20updated%202012.pdf

Eccles, J. S. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 78-89. doi:101080/00461520902832368

Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectations, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Eds.), Perspectives on achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75-146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.

Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1997). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.). Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, 5th ed., pp. 1017-1095). New York, NY: Wiley.

Fouad, N. A., & Smith, P. L. (1996). A test of a social cognitive model for middle school students: Math and science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(3), 338-346. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.43.3.338

-H National Headquarters. (2011). Mission mandates [Fact Sheet]. Retrieved from https:nifa.usda.gov/sites/default/files/resource/4-H Mission Mandates.pdf

Frank, K. A., Muller, C., Schiller, K. S., Riegle-Crumb, C., Mueller, A. S., Crosnoe, R., & Pearson, J. (2008). The social dynamics of mathematics course taking in high school. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 1645-1696. doi:10.1086/587153

Hagedorn, L. S., & Purnamasari, A. V. (2012). A realistic look at STEM and the role of community colleges. Community College Review, 145-164. doi:10.1177/0091552112443701

Hines, S. M. (2003). Multicultural science education: Theory, practice, and promise. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Johnson, H., & Sengupta, R. (2009). Closing the gap: Meeting California's needs for college graduates. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.

Landivar, L. C. (2013). Disparities in STEM employment by sex, race, and Hispanic origin. United States Census Bureau.

Litow, S. (2008, July 21). A silent crisis: The underrepresentation of Latinos in STEM careers. Education Week. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2008/07/18/44litow-com_web.h27.html

Lynch, S. J. (2011). Equity and U.S. science education policy from the G.I. Bill to NCLB: From opportunity denied to mandated outcomes. In G. E. DeBoer (Ed.), The role of public policy in K-12 science education (pp. 305-354). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

Mau, W. C. (2003). Factors that influence persistence in science and engineering career aspirations. Career Development Quarterly, 51(3), 234-243.

National Academy of Sciences. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved September 1, 2011, from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11463

National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). High School Longitudinal Study: 2009 EDAT extract codebook. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/hsls09/hsls09_data.asp

National Science Board. (2018). Science and engineering indicators (Policy Companion Brief No. NSB-2018-7). Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/sei/companion-brief/NSB-2018-7.pdf

National Science Foundation. (2012). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering [web page]. Retrieved November 10, 2012, from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2013/race.cfm

Navarro, R. L., Flores, L. Y., & Worthington, R. L. (2007). Mexican American middle school students’ goal intentions in mathematics and science: A test of social cognitive career theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 320-335. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.54.3.320

Rice, J. E., Rugg, B., & Davis, S. (2016). Minnesota 4-H science and agriculture challenge: Infusing agricultural science and engineering concepts into 4-H youth development. Journal of Extension, 54(3), Article 3IAW4. Retrieved from https://www.joe.org/joe/2016june/iw4.php

Rochin, R. I., & Mello, S. F. (2007). Latinos in science: Trends and opportunities. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 305-355. doi:10.1177/1538192707306552

Sallee, J., & Peek, G. (2014). Fitting the framework: The STEM Institute and the 4-H essential elements. Journal of Extension, 52(2), Article 2FEA8. Retrieved from http://www.joe.org/joe/2014april/a8.php

Scott, A. (2010). Dissecting the data: The STEM education opportunity gap in California. San Francisco, CA: Level Playing Field Institute.

Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 70-83. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70

Stake, J. E. (2006). The critical mediating role of social encouragement for science motivation and confidence among high school girls and boys. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1017-1045.

Stake, J. E., & Nickens, S. D. (2005). Adolescent girls’ and boys’ science peer relationships and perceptions of the possible self as scientist. Sex Roles, 52, 1-11. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00053.x

U.S. Department of Education. (2008). 2007 Elementary and secondary school survey. Washington, DC: Office for Civil Rights.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-12

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2019)

Section

Program & Practice Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.