Frontiers in Theory-Predicated Research in Youth Development: A Commentary

Authors

  • Richard M. Lerner Institute for Applied Research in Youth Development, Tufts University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2019.739

Keywords:

dynamic systems theory, relational developmental systems metatheory, developmental methodology, idiographic change, specificity principle

Abstract

The field of youth development sits at the frontier of new opportunities for research and practice. These opportunities are enabled by innovations in theory and in theory-inspired research methods. Framed by relational developmental systems metatheory, dynamic systems models of youth development emphasize that every young person has the potential to change positively by aligning specific individual strengths and contextual resources that, together, can optimize the life paths of a young person. The methods linked to these theoretical models combine to help identify the specific links between an individual and his or her context that may maximize thriving across the adolescent decade. The evidence derived from theory-predicated use of these methods may be used to create innovations in youth development programs and policies that promote lives of personal thriving and social contribution among the diverse young people of our world.

References

Baltes, P. B., Lindenberger, U., & Staudinger, U. M. (2006). Life-span theory in developmental psychology. In R. M. Lerner (Volume Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1 Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 569-664). Editors-in-chief: William Damon and Richard M. Lerner. New York: Wiley.

Baltes, P. B., Reese, H. W., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1977). Life-span developmental psychology: Introduction to research methods. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Bjorklund, D. F. (2015). Developing adaptations. Developmental Review, 38, 13-35. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.002

Bjorklund, D. F. (2016). Prepared is not preformed: Commentary on Witherington and Lickliter. Human Development, 59, 235-241. doi:10.1159/000452289

Bjorklund, D. F., & Ellis, B. J. (2005). Evolutionary psychology and child development: An emerging synthesis. In B. J. Ellis & D. F. Bjorklund (Eds.), Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and child development (pp. 3-18). New York: Guilford.

Bornstein, M. H. (2017). The specificity principle in acculturation science. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 12(1), 3-45. doi:10.1177/1745691616655997

Bronfenbrenner, U. (Ed.). (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1 Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 793–828). Editors-in-chief: W. Damon & R. M. Lerner. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., Lövdén, M., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Lindenberger, U. (2010). Adult age differences in covariation of motivation and working memory performance: Contrasting between-person and within-person findings. Research in Human Development, 7(1), 61-78. doi:10.1080/15427600903578177

Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., Lövdén, M., & Lindenberger, U. (2012). Daily variability in working memory is coupled with negative affect: The role of attention and motivation. Emotion, 12(3), 605-716. doi:10.1037/a0024436

Buss, D. M. (Ed.). (2015). The handbook of evolutionary psychology, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.

Cantor, P., Osher, D., Berg, J., Steyer, L. & Rose, T. (2018). Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context. Applied Developmental Science. doi:10.1080/10888691.2017.1398649.

Card, N. A. (2017). Methodological issues in measuring the development of character. Journal of Character Education, 13(2), 29-45.

Cole, S. W. (2014). Human social genomics. PLOS Genetics, 10(8), 1–7. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004601

Collins, L. M. (2006). Analysis of longitudinal data: The integration of theoretical model, temporal design, and statistical model. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 505–528. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190146

Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Still stable after all these years: Personality as a key to some issues in adulthood and old age. In P. B. Baltes & O. G. Brim, Jr. (Eds.), Life span development and behavior. Volume 3 (pp. 65–102). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Del Giudice, M. (2014). An evolutionary life history framework for psychopathology. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 261-300. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2014.884918

Del Giudice, M. (2015). Self-regulation in an evolutionary perspective. In G. H. E. Gendolla, M. Tops, & S. Koole (Eds.), Handbook of behavioral approaches to self-regulation (pp. 25-42). New York: Springer.

Descartes, R. (1641/1993). Discourse on method; and, Meditations on first philosophy. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

Duncan, G. J., Engel, M., Classens, A., & Dowsett, C. L. (2014). Replication and robustness in developmental research. Developmental Psychology, 50(11), 2417-2425. doi:10.1037/a0037996

Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Elder, G. H., Shanahan, M. J., & Jennings, J. A. (2015). Human development in time and place. In M. H. Bornstein and T. Leventhal (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, vol. 4: Ecological settings and processes in developmental systems (7th ed., pp. 6–54). Editor-in-chief: R. M. Lerner. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Freedman, D. G. (1979). Human sociobiology: A holistic approach. New York, NY: Free Press.

Geldhof, G. J., Larsen, T., Urke, H., Holsen, I., Lewis, H., & Tyler, C. P. (2019). Indicators of positive youth development can be maladaptive: The example case of caring. Journal of Adolescence, 71, 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.11.008

Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. (2005). Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Joseph, J. (2015). The trouble with twin studies: A reassessment of twin research in the social and behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.

Lerner, R. M. (1984). On the nature of human plasticity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lerner, R. M. (2004). Liberty: Thriving and civic engagement among America’s youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lerner, R. M. (2012). Essay review: Developmental science: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Developmental Science, 6(1-2), 29-36. doi:10.3233/DEV-2012-12102

Lerner, R. M. (2018). Concepts and theories of human development, 4th ed. New York: Routledge.

Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. B., Geldhof, G. J., Gestsdóttir, S., King, P. E., Sim, A. T. R., . . . Dowling, E. (2018). Studying positive youth development in different nations: Theoretical and methodological issues. In J. J. Lansford & P. Banati (Eds.) Handbook of Adolescent Development Research and Its Impact on Global Policy (pp. 68-83). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Lerner, R. M., & Overton, W. F. (2017). Reduction to absurdity: Why epigenetics invalidates all models involving genetic reduction. Human Development, 60(2-3), 107-123. doi:10.1159/000477995

Lerner, R. M., Tirrell, J. M., Dowling, E. M., Geldhof, J., Gestsdóttir, S., Lerner, J. V., . . . Sim, A. T. R. (2018). The end of the beginning: Evidence and absences studying PYD in a global context. Adolescent Research Review. doi.org/10.1007/s40894-018-0093-4.

McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., Hřebíčková, M., Avia, M. D., . . . Smith, P. B. (2000). Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and life span development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 173–186. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.173

Molenaar, P. C. M. (2014). Dynamic models of biological pattern formation have surprising implications for understanding the epigenetics of development. Research in Human Development, 11, 50–62. doi:10.1080/15427609.2014.874765

Molenaar, P. C. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2014). New trends in the inductive use of relation developmental systems theory: Ergodicity, nonstationarity, and heterogeneity. In P. C. Molenaar, R. M. Lerner, and K. M. Newell (Eds.), Handbook of Developmental Systems and Methodology. (pp. 442-462). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Molenaar, P. C. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2015). Systems methods for developmental research. In W. F. Overton, & P. C. Molenaar (Eds.), Theory and method. Volume 1 of the handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th ed., pp. 652–682). Editor-in-chief: R. M. Lerner. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Moore, D. S. (2015). The developing genome: An introduction to behavioral epigenetics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Nesselroade, J. R., & Baltes, P. B. (Eds.). (1979). Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Nesselroade, J. R., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2010). Emphasizing intraindividual variability in the study of development over the life span. In W. F. Overton (Ed.), The handbook of life-span development. Vol. 1: Cognition, biology, methods (pp. 30-54). Editor-in-chief: R. M. Lerner. Hoboken: Wiley.

Osher, D., Cantor, P., Berg, J., Steyer, L. & Rose, T. (2018). Drivers of human development: How relationships and context shape learning and development. Applied Developmental Science. doi:10.1080/10888691.2017.1398650.

Overton, W. F. (2015). Process and relational developmental systems. In W. F. Overton & P. C. M. Molenaar (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, Volume 1: Theory and Method (7th ed., pp. 9-62). Editor-in-chief: R. M. Lerner. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Pigliucci, M., & Mueller, G. B. (2010). Elements of an extended evolutionary synthesis. In M. Pigliucci & G. B. Mueller (Eds.), Evolution – The extended synthesis (pp. 3-17). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Plomin, R. (2018). Blueprint: How DNA makes us who we are. London, UK: Allen Lane.

Plomin, R., Defries, J. C., Knopik, & J. M. Neiderhiser, J. M. (2016). Top 10 replicated findings from behavioral genetics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(1), 3-23. doi:10.1177/1745691615617439

Ram, N., Chow, S. M., Bowles, R. P., Wang, L., Grimm, K., Fujita, F., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2005). Examining interindividual differences in cyclicity of pleasant and unpleasant affect using spectral analysis and item response modeling. Psychometrika, 70, 773–790. doi:10.1007/s11336-001-1270-5

Richardson, K. (2017), Genes, brains and human potential: The science and ideology of human intelligence. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Rose, T. (2016). The end of average: How we succeed in a world that values sameness. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

Simmons, R. G., & Blyth, D. A. (1987). Moving into adolescence: The impact of pubertal change and school context. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.

Slavich, G. M., & Cole, S. W. (2013). The emerging field of human social genomics. Clinical Psychological Science, 1, 331–348. doi:10.1177/2167702613478594

Spencer, M. B., Swanson, D. P., & Harpalani, V. (2015). Development of the self. In M. E. Lamb (Volume Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, Volume 3: Socioemotional processes (7th ed., pp. 750-793). Editor-in-Chief: R. M. Lerner. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Vandell, D. L., Larson, R. W., Mahoney, J. L., & Watts, T. W. (2015). Children’s organized activities. In M. H. Bornstein & T. Leventhal (Volume Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, Volume 4: Ecological settings and processes (7th ed., pp. 305-344). Editor-in-Chief: R. M. Lerner. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Woese, C. R. (2004). A new biology for a new century. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 68(2), 173-186. doi:10.1128/MMBR.68.2.173-186.2004

YouthPower Learning. (2017). A systematic review of positive youth development programs in low- and middle-income countries. Washington, DC: Making Cents International.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-12

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2019)

Section

Thought Leader Commentary

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.