The Arthur Interactive Media Study: Initial Findings From a Cross-Age Peer Mentoring and Digital Media-Based Character Development Program

Authors

  • Edmond P. Bowers Clemson University
  • Lacey J. Hilliard Tufts University
  • Milena Batanova Tufts University
  • Danielle C. Stacey Tufts University
  • Jonathan M. Tirrell Tufts University
  • Katherine Wartella
  • Richard M. Lerner Tufts University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2015.7

Abstract

In the midst of increasing emphasis on the inclusion of character education in both school and out-of-school time programs, digital technologies have become ubiquitous in these settings. Based on the potential of these technologies to enhance children’s character development, the Arthur Interactive Media (AIM) study investigated if one specific unit or set of digital media-based activities engaged youth in discussions about character. First and second grade students were paired with 4th and 5th grade students, respectively, while engaging with an online interactive graphic novel (IGN) about a character-relevant story based on the Arthur cartoon series. Teachers (n = 8) completed surveys about the AIM Unit, and conversations between cross-age peer dyads (n = 27 dyads) during their engagement with the IGN were analyzed. Results indicated that teachers were very satisfied with the materials and reported that children were very engaged throughout. Analyses of children’s conversations indicated that children participated in character-relevant conversations involving humility, forgiveness, and future-mindedness while engaging with the IGN.

References

American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Communications and Media (2013). Children, adolescents, and the media. Pediatrics, 132, 958–961.

Bailey, B., Tettegah, S., & Bradley, T. (2006). Clover: Connecting technology and character education using personally-constructed animated vignettes. Interact. Comput. 18(4), 793–819.

Barber, B.K., & Olsen, J.A. (1997). Socialization in context connection, regulation, and autonomy in the family, school, and neighborhood, and with peers. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12(2), 287-315.

Bers, M., & Kazakoff, E. (2013). Techno-Tykes: Digital technologies in early education. In O. Saracho & B. Spodek (Eds.), Handbook of research and the education of young children (3rd ed., pp. 197-205), London: Routledge.

Burrell, B., Wood, S., Pikes, T., and Holliday, C. (2001). Student mentors and proteges: Learning together. The Council for Exceptional Children, 33, 24-29.

Calvert, S.L. (2015). Children and digital media. In M.H. Bornstein and T. Leventhal Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science (7th ed., pp. 375-415), Volume 4: Ecological Settings and Processes in Developmental Systems. Editor-in-chief: R.M. Lerner. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.

Cassidy, K.W., Werner, R.S., Rourke, M., Zubernis, L.S. & Balaraman, G. (2003). The relationship between psychological understanding and positive social behaviors. Social Development, 12, 198–221.

Clark, K. (1998). Intersection of instructional television and computer assisted learning: Implications for research paradigms. In J. Asamen & G. Berry (Eds.), Research paradigms in the study of television and social behavior (pp. 287–304). Newbury Park, CA: Sage

Damon, W. (1988). The moral child: Nurturing children's natural moral growth. New York, NY: Free Press.

Damon, W. (2008). The path to purpose: How young people find their calling in life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster:

Davis, D.E., Hook, J.N., Worthington Jr, E.L., Van Tongeren, D.R., Gartner, A.L., Jennings, D.J., & Emmons, R.A. (2011). Relational humility: Conceptualizing and measuring humility as a personality judgment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 225–234.

Davis, D.E., Worthington Jr, E.L., & Hook, J.N. (2010). Humility: Review of measurement strategies and conceptualization as personality judgment. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(4), 243-252.

Davis, D.., Worthington Jr, E.L., Hook, J.N., Emmons, R.A., Hill, P.C., Bollinger, R.A., & Van Tongeren, D.R. (2013). Humility and the development and repair of social bonds: Two longitudinal studies. Self and Identity, 12, 58-77.

DiBlasio, F.A., & Proctor, J.H. (1993). Therapists and the clinical use of forgiveness. American Journal of Family Therapy, 21(2), 175-184.

Druin, A. (1999). Cooperative inquiry: Developing new technologies for children with children. Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI 99 (pp. 223-230). New York: ACM.

Durlak, J.A., Weissberg, R.P., & Pachan, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3-4), 294-309.

Echols, M., & Finkbiner, L. (2013). The development of children’s understanding of humility. Chrestomathy: Annual Review of Undergraduate Research, 12, 1-23.

Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T.L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). Prosocial Development. In M.E. Lamb (Vol. Ed.) and R.M. Lerner (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (7th ed, pp. 610-656). New York: Wiley.

Farrington, D., & Ttofi, M. (2009). School-based programs to reduce bullying and victimization. Washington, DC: Campbell Corporation.

Ferguson, C.J. (2013). Violent video games and the Supreme Court: Lessons for the scientific community in the wake of Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association. American Psychologist, 68, 57–74.

Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Teachers use of educational technology in U.S. public schools: 2009. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, D.C.

Hargrave, T.D. (1994). Families and forgiveness: A theoretical and therapeutic framework. The Family Journal, 2(4), 339-348.

Jonassen, D., Howland, J., Moore, J., & Marra, R. (2003). Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. Karcher, M. J. (2007). Cross-age peer mentoring. Youth Mentoring: Research in Action, 1(7), 3–17.

Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization (pp. 347-480). New York: Rand McNally.

Lapsley, D.K., & Narvaez, D. (2006). Character education. In A. Renninger & I. Siegel (Eds.) and W. Damon & R. Lerner (Editors-in-Chief.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Child psychology in practice (6th ed., pp. 248-296). New York: Wiley.

Larson, R.W., Jensen, L.A., Kang, H., Griffith, A, & Rompala, V. (2012). Peer groups as a crucible of positive value development in a global world. In Trommsdorff, G., & Chen, X. (Eds.), Values, Religion, and Culture in Adolescent Development (pp. 164- 187). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lerner, R.M. (2004). Liberty: Thriving and civic engagement among America's youth. Sage Publications.

Lerner, R.M., & Callina, K.S. (2014). The study of character development: Towards tests of a relational developmental systems model. Human Development, 57, 322–346.

Lerner, R.M., Lerner, J.V., Lewin-Bizan, S., Bowers, E.P., Boyd, M., Mueller, M., Schmid, K., Napolitano, C. (2011). Positive youth development: Processes, programs, and problematics. Journal of Youth Development, 6(3), 40 – 64.

Myers, D. (2000). The American paradox: Spiritual hunger in an age of plenty. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Narvaez, D., Mattan, B., MacMichael, C., & Squillace, M. (2008). Kill bandits, collect gold or save the dying: The effects of playing a prosocial video game. Media Psychology Review,1(1). Retrieved from http://mprcenter.org/mpr/index.php?option=com_content &view= article&id=35& Itemid=121

National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Committee on Defining Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills, J.W. Pellegrino & M.L. Hilton, Editors. Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Nucci, L.P. (1997). Moral development and character formation. In H.J. Walberg, & G.D. Haertel (Eds.), Psychology and Educational Practice (pp. 127-157). Berkeley, CA: MacCarchan.

Peterson, C., & Seligman, M.E.P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Sestir, M., & Bartholow, B. (2010). Violent and nonviolent video games produce opposing effects on aggressive and prosocial outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 934-942.

Smith, P.K., Cowie, H., Olafsson, R.F., Liefooghe, A.P., et al. (2002). Definitions of bullying: A comparison of terms used, and age and gender differences, in a Fourteen–Country international comparison. Child Development, 73(4), 1119-1133.

Sojourner, R.J. (2012). The rebirth and retooling of character education in America. Retrieved from http://www.character.org/wp-content/uploads/Character-Education.pdf

Steinberg, L., Graham, S., O’Brien, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, E., & Banich, M. (2009). Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Development, 80, 28 – 44.

Stevens, R., Satwicz, T., & McCarthy, L. (2008). In-game, in-room, in-world: Reconnecting video game play to the rest of kids’ lives. The ecology of games: Connecting youth, games, and learning, 9, 41-66.

Takeuchi, L., & Stevens, R. (2011). The new coviewing: Designing for learning through joint media engagement. In New York, NY: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.

Tasca, A. (2002). Teaching and Learning in Science Through a Science Buddies Programs. Investigating: Australian Primary & Junior Science Journal, 18, 16-19.

Tettegah, S. (2005). Technology, narratives, vignettes, and the intercultural and cross-cultural teaching portal. Urban Education, 40 (4), 368–393.

Turner, V.D., & Berkowitz, M.W. (2005). Scaffolding morality: Positioning a socio-cultural construct. New Ideas in Psychology, 23(3), 174-184.

Walker, L., Hennig, K., & Krettenauer, T. (2000). Parent and peer contexts for children's moral reasoning development. Child Development, 71(4), 1033-1048.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-17

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 3 (2015): The Promotion of Character through Youth Development Programs

Section

Feature Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.