Cross-Cultural Perspectives After Participation in the YES Program: A Pilot Study

Authors

  • Vanessa E. Fuentes The Catholic University of America
  • Elizabeth A. Goncy Virginia Commonwealth University
  • Kevin S. Sutherland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2015.8

Abstract

Abstract:  Guided by empowerment and ecological theories, the Youth Empowerment Solutions (YES) program facilitates character development through activities based in cultural differences, team building, and social change. This pilot study consisted of two focus groups (n = 13) of middle school youth conducted after their participation in an abbreviated version of the YES program. Specifically, the present study examined youth’s cross-cultural perspectives after participation. The focus groups were transcribed and coded for emergent themes using Heaton’s (2005) supplementary data analysis framework. Qualitative analysis resulted in two emergent themes: 1) enhanced appreciation for similarities and differences in cultural and ethnic backgrounds, and 2) the role of respect in understanding differences and confronting stereotypes. Specifically, youth reported that engagement in this program fostered positive awareness of cultural differences and respect for inter-ethnic relationships. The findings provide support for the benefits of the YES program on moral development and promotion of healthy peer relationships.

References

Aberson, C.L., & Gaffney, A.M. (2008). An integrated threat model of explicit and implicit attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 808-830. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.582

Bagci, S.C., Rutland, A., Kumashiro, M., Smith, P.K., & Blumberg, H. (2014). Are minority status children’s cross-ethnic friendships beneficial in a multiethnic context? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32, 107-115. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12028

Bellmore, A.D., Witkow, M.R., Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (2004). Beyond the individual: The impact of ethnic context and classroom behavioral norms on victims’ adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 40, 1159 – 1172. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1159

Benner, A.D., & Wang, Y. (2014). Demographic marginalization, social integration, and adolescents’ educational success. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1611-1627. doi:10.1007/s10964-014-0151-6

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cameron, L, & Rutland, A. (2008). An integrative approach to changing children’s intergroup attitudes. In S. Levy & M. Killen (Eds.), Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood (pp. 191-203). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Heaton, J. (2004). Reworking qualitative data. London: Sage.

Hitti, A., & Killen, M. (2015). Expectations about ethnic peer group inclusivity: The role of shared interests, group norms, and stereotypes. Child Development. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12393

Jackson, M.F., Barth, J.M., Powell, N., & Lochman, J.E. (2006). Classroom contextual effects of race on children’s peer nominations. Child Development, 77, 1325 – 1337. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00937.x

Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2006). Ethnic diversity and perceptions of safety in urban middle schools. Psychological Science, 17, 393 – 400. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01718.x

Killen, M. (2007). Children's social and moral reasoning about exclusion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 32-36.

Nucci, L.P. (2001). Education in the Moral Domain. New York: Cambridge Press.

Olweus, D., & Limber, S.P. (2007). Olweus bullying prevention program: Teacher guide. Center City: Hazelden.

Page-Gould, E. (2012). To whom can I turn? Maintenance of positive intergroup relations in the face of intergroup conflict. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 462–470. doi:10.1177/1948550611426937

Pettigrew, T.F. (2008). Future directions for intergroup contact theory and research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 187-199. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2007.12.002

Rutland, A., & Killen, M. (2015). A developmental science approach to reducing prejudice and social exclusion: Intergroup processes, social-cognitive development, and moral reasoning. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9, 121-154. doi:10.1111/sipr.12012

Salzman, M., & D’Andrea, M. (2001). Assessing the impact of a prejudice prevention project. Journal of Counseling & Development, 79, 341–347.

Smetana, J.G. (2006). Social-cognitive domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. In M. Killen & J.G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 119–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Tolsma, J., van Deurzen, I., Stark, T.H., & Veenstra, R. (2013). Who is bullying whom in ethnically diverse primary schools? Exploring links between bullying, ethnicity, and ethnic diversity in Dutch primary schools. Social Networks, 35, 51-61. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2012.12.002

Tropp, L.R., & Prenovost, M.A. (2008). The role of intergroup contact in predicting children’s interethnic attitudes: Evidence from meta-analytic and field studies. In S. Levy & M. Killen (Eds.), Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood (pp. 236-248). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Verkuyten, M. (2008). Multiculturalism and group evaluations among minority and majority groups. In S. Levy & M. Killen (Eds.), Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood (pp. 157–172). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Vervoort, M.H.M., Scholte, R.H.J., & Overbeek, G. (2010). Bullying and victimization among adolescents: The role of ethnicity and ethnic composition of school class. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 1-11. doi: 10.1007/s10964-008-9355-y

Virginia Department of Education. (2015). Virginia Department of Education Fall Membership.Retrieved June 26, 2015, from http://www.doe.virginia.gov/statistics_reports/enrollment/fall_membership/index.shtml

Zimmerman, M.A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43-63). New York: Plenum.

Zimmerman, M.A., Stewart, S.E., Morrel-Samuels, S., Franzen, S., & Reischl, T.M. (2011). Youth empowerment solutions for peaceful communities: Combining theory and practice in a community-level violence prevention curriculum. Health Promotion Practice, 12, 425-439. doi: 10.1177/1524839909357316

Downloads

Published

2016-05-17

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 3 (2015): The Promotion of Character through Youth Development Programs

Section

Feature Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.