Can We Efficiently Help Adults Strengthen their Relational Practice?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2022.1199

Keywords:

positive youth development, adult-child interaction, professional development, youth work, design research

Abstract

Human interactions across settings shape young people’s learning and development, and building adult expertise in facilitating productive interactions takes deliberate practice and reflective experience. However, relational practices are not consistently part of adult learning for those who work with youth. We describe a 2-year design study to develop the Simple Interactions Leadership Program, a professional learning workshop focused on relational practices. We refined the program across 3 iterations with library and after-school staff (with a total of 41 participants). Iterative changes included adding participant-driven “try-it-out” projects, adding external accountability features, and combining staff from the library and after-school sectors. Using artifacts and memos from workshops and participants’ reflections, we found that these features incrementally improved participants’ engagement, depth of learning, and sense of professional community—which we suggest are three central goals for related professional development efforts. As a collective youth-serving field, we need effective and scalable ways to help adults recognize and strengthen their relational practices with young people. The Simple Interactions Leadership Program offers a flexible structure for professional learning focused on building expertise in relational practice while sustaining change and improvement through continuous reflection within communities of practice.

Author Biography

Thomas Akiva, University of Pittsburgh

Associate Professor

Department of Health & Human Development

School of Education

References

Akiva, T., Li, J., Martin, K. M., Horner, C. G., & McNamara, A. R. (2016). Simple interactions: Piloting a strengths-based and interaction-based professional development intervention for out-of-school time programs. Child and Youth Care Forum, 46(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-016-9375-9

Akiva, T., White, A. M., Colvin, S., DeMand, A., & Page, L. C. (2020). Simple interactions: A randomized controlled trial of relational training for adults who work with young people across settings. Applied Developmental Science, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2020.1819809

Baldwin, C. K. (2019). Exploring a constructivist redesign of youth work training: Transformative-oriented learning and trainer development. Child & Youth Services, 40(4), 331–362.

Bandura, A. (1994). Bandura Self-efficacy defined. In Encyclopedia of Human Behavior.

Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology, 51(2), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00092

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.

Bethell, C., Jones, J., Gombjav, N., Linkenbach, J., & Sege, R. (2019). Positive childhood experiences and adult mental and relational health in a statewide sample: Associations across adverse childhood experiences levels. JAMA Pediatrics, 173(11), e193007. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3007

Borko, H., & Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003

Bowers, E. P., Johnson, S. K., Warren, D. J., Tirrell, J. M., & Lerner, J. V. (2015). Youth–adult relationships and positive youth development. In E. P. Bowers, G. J. Geldhof, S. K. Johnson, L. J. Hilliard, R. M. Hershberg, J. V. Lerner, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Promoting positive youth development: Lessons from the 4-H Study (pp. 97–120). Springer, Cham.

Brion-Meisels, G., & Jones, S. M. (2012). Learning about relationships. Positive relationships (pp. 55-72). Springer.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design, (pp 56 – 60). Harvard University Press.

Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & Lemahieu, P. G. (2017). Learning to improve. Harvard Educational Review.

Cantor, P., Osher, D., Berg, J., Steyer, L., & Rose, T. (2019). Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context1. Applied Developmental Science, 23(4), 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2017.1398649

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801

The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005

Eccles, J.S., & Gootman, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Committee on Community-Level Programs for Youth. National Academy Press.

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363

Gordon, S. P. (2004). Professional development for school improvement: Empowering learning communities. Pearson Education.

Gravemeijer, K., Van Eerde, D. (2009). Design research as a means for building a knowledge base for teachers and teaching in mathematics education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 510–524. https://doi.org/10.1086/596999

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Hill, S. L., Connolly, J., Akiva, T., & McNamara, A. R. (2017). Taking it to a new level: Inquiry-based professional development as a field building enterprise. In H. J. Malone & T. Donahue (Eds.), The growing out-of-school time field: Past, present, and future. Information Age Publishing.

Jacobson, L. (2019). Educators continue Mister Rogers’ legacy through “Simple Interactions.” Education Dive. https://www.educationdive.com/news/educators-continue-mister-rogers-legacy-through-simple-interactions/567922/

Jones, J. N., & Deutsch, N. L. (2011). Relational strategies in after-school settings: How staff–youth relationships support positive development. Youth & Society, 43(4), 1381–1406.

Larson, R. W., & Walker, K. C. (2010). Dilemmas of practice: challenges to program quality encountered by youth program leaders. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3–4), 338–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9307-z

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Murry, V. M., Smith, E. P., Bowers, E. P., Geldhof, G. J., & Buckingham, M. H. (2021). Positive youth development in 2020: Theory, research, programs, and the promotion of social justice. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(4), 1114-1134.

Li, J., & Julian, M. M. (2012). Developmental relationships as the active ingredient: A unifying working hypothesis of “what works” across intervention settings. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01151.x

Li, J., & Winters, D. (2019). Simple , Everyday Interactions as the Active Ingredient of Early Childhood Education. Bridging Research and Practice, January/February, 60–62.

Miles, M. B. (1995). Foreward. In M. Guskey, T. R.; Huberman (Ed.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. vii–ix). Teacher’s College Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Minsky, M. (1988). Society of mind. Simon and Schuster.

Morel, R. P., Coburn, C. E., Catterson, A. K., & Higgs, J. (2019). The Multiple Meanings of Scale: Implications for Researchers and Practitioners. Educational Researcher.

National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. (2014). Supportive relationships and active skill-building strengthen the foundations of resilience. Working Paper No. 13. http://developingchild.harvard.edu/resources/reports_and_working_papers/

Norton, M. I., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2012). The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.002

Okoli, J. O., Weller, G., & Watt, J. (2016). Information processing and intuitive decision-making on the fireground: towards a model of expert intuition. Cognition, Technology and Work, 18(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0348-9

Osher, D., Cantor, P., Berg, J., Steyer, L., & Rose, T. (2018). Drivers of human development: How relationships and context shape learning and development1. Applied Developmental Science, 24(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2017.1398650

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.) SAGE Publications.

Pozzoboni, K., & Kirshner, B. (2016). The changing landscape of youth work: Theory and practice for an evolving field. Information Age Publishing.

Robinson, K., & Akiva, T. (2021). Introduction: A new way forward. In T. Akiva & K. Robinson (Eds.), It takes an ecosystem: Understanding the people, places, and possibilities of learning and development across settings (pp. 1-12). Information Age Publishing.

Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Sandoval, W. (2014). Conjecture Mapping: An Approach to Systematic Educational Design Research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.778204

Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M., Schwindt, K. (2011). Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.009

Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman., Eds.; A. R. Luria, M. Lopez-Morillas & M. Cole [with J. V. Wertsch], Trans.) Harvard University Press. (Original manuscripts [ca. 1930-1934].)

Walker, K. C., & Larson, R. W. (2012). Youth worker reasoning about dilemmas encountered in practice: Expert-novice differences. Journal of Youth Development, 7(1), 23-May. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2012.149

Wlodkowski, R. J. (2003). Fostering Motivation in Professional Development Programs. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2003(98), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.98

Yohalem, N., Wilson-Ahlstrom, A., Fischer, S., & Shinn, M. (2009). Measuring youth program quality: A guide to assessment tools (2nd ed.). The Forum for Youth Investment.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-15

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 4 (2022)

Section

Feature Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.