Using the 4-H Essential Elements to Evaluate Teen Programming

Authors

  • Joy R. Lile Washington State Department of Children, Youth and Families https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6866-5373
  • Elizabeth H. Weybright Washington State University
  • Pam Watson Washington State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2021.906

Keywords:

adolescence, 4-H, program evaluation, needs assessment, Essential Elements

Abstract

National and state trends indicate participation in 4-H programming declines throughout adolescence. Past research suggests factors that may influence recruitment and retention of teens into youth development programming. Washington State University undertook an evaluation to understand the needs and desires of teens in the 4-H program and make recommendations for improvements to recruitment and retention of teens in 4-H. The study sample was made up of 93 young people aged 12 to 19 years who participated in the online survey. Results included youth demographics, participation styles, communication preferences, youth outcomes, and feedback about program benefits and opportunities for growth. The results of this study are reviewed and framed within the 4-H Essential Elements. Recommendations are made to leverage youth voice and encourage innovation in 4-H teen programming.

Author Biographies

Joy R. Lile, Washington State Department of Children, Youth and Families

4-H Regional Specialist for Clallam, Jefferson and Kitsap Counties; Assistant Professor in the Youth and Families Unit of WSU Extension.

Elizabeth H. Weybright, Washington State University

Associate Professor of Human Development and Extension Specialist, Human Development Department, Washington State Universtiy

Pam Watson, Washington State University

4-H Faculty in Lewis County, Wa.

References

Akiva, T., Cortina, K., & Smith, C. (2014). Involving youth in program decision-making: How common and what might it do for youth? Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 43(11), 1844–1860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0183-y

Albright, M. B., & Ferrari, T. M. (2010). "Push” and “pull” A qualitative study of factors that contribute to older youth leaving the 4-H program. Journal of Youth Development, 5(3), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2010.209

Anderson-Butcher, D. (2005). Recruitment and retention in youth development programming. The Prevention Researcher, 12(2), 3-6.

Anderson-Butcher, D., Newsom, W. S., & Ferrari, T. M. (2003). Participation in Boys and Girls Clubs and relationship to youth outcomes. Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1), 39-55.

Arnold, M. E. (2018). From context to outcomes: A thriving model of 4-H youth development programs. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 6(1), 141-160.

Arnold, M. E., Flesch, J. M., Ashton, C., Black, L., Brody, B., Hosty, M., & Northway, S. (2016). YA4-H! Youth advocates for health: Impact of a 4-H teens-as-teachers program. Journal of Extension, 54(6), rb5. https://archives.joe.org/joe/2016december/rb5.php

Arnold, M. E., Gifford, L. N., Deen, M. K., Calodich, S., & Edwards, J. W. (2015). YA4-H! Youth advocates for health - Teens as teachers. Oregon State University Public Health Extension.

Bartoszuk, K., & Randall, B. A. (2011). Characteristics and perceptions of 4-H participants: Gender and age differences across adolescence. Journal of Extension, 49(3), 48-55. https://archives.joe.org/joe/2011june/a6.php

Bellanca, J. A. (Ed.). (2010). 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn. Solution Tree Press.

Chung, S., & McBride, A. M. (2015). Social and emotional learning in middle school curricula: A service learning model based on positive youth development. Children and Youth Services Review, 53, 192-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.04.008

Defore, A. B., Fuhrman, N. E., Peake, J. B., & Duncan, D. W. (2011). Factors influencing 4-H club enrollment and retention in Georgia. Journal of Youth Development, 6(2), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2011.188

Downey, L. H., Peterson, D. J., LeMenestrel, S., Leatherman, J., & Lang, J. (2014). 4-H Healthy Living programs with impact: A national environmental scan. New Directors for Youth Development, 2014(143), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20101

Fields, N. I., Moncloa, F., & Smith, C. (2018). 4-H social justice youth development: A guide for youth development professionals. University of Maryland

Harder, A., Lamm, A., Lamm, D., Rask, G., & Rose, H. (2005). An in-depth look at 4-H enrollment and retention. Journal of Extension, 43(5), rb4. https://archives.joe.org/joe/2005october/rb4.php

High/Scope Educational Research Foundation. (2005). Youth program quality assessment. High/Scope Press.

Homan, G., Dick, J., & Hedrick, J. (2007). Differences in youth perceptions of Ohio 4-H based on gender. Journal of Extension, 45(5), rb7. https://archives.joe.org/joe/2007october/rb7.php

Interagency Working Group on Youth Programs. (2016). Pathways for youth: Strategic plan for federal collaboration. https://youth.gov/sites/default/files/IWGYP-Pathways_for_Youth.pdf

Kress, C. (2005). Essential elements of positive youth development. In Strengthening positive youth development environments (pp. 20-23). University of Wisconsin Extension 4-H Program.

Lerner, R. M., & Lerner, J. V. (2013). The positive development of youth: Report of the findings from the first seven years of the 4-H study of positive youth development. Institute for Applied Research in Youth Development, Tufts University. https://4-h.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/4-H-Study-of-Positive-Youth-Development-Full-Report.pdf

Lewis, K. M., Horrillo, S. J., Widaman, K., Worker, S. M., & Trzesniewski, K. (2015). National 4-H Common Measures: Initial evaluation from California 4-H. Journal of Extension, 53(2), rb3. https://archives.joe.org/joe/2015april/rb3.php

Martz, J., Mincemoyer, C., McNeely, N. N., Bledsoe, L., Dart, P., & Worthington, K. (2009). Essential elements of 4-H youth development programs. National 4-H Council.

McGuire, J. K., Dworkin, J., Borden, L. M., Perkins, D., & Russell, S. T. (2016). Youth motivations for program participation. Journal of Youth Development, 11(3), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2016.457

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Mullendore, J. (n.d.). Getting the most out of Common Measures 2.0. National 4-H Council and University of Nebraska-Lincoln. http://www.4-h.uconn.edu/evaluation/docs/collection/IntroductionCM2.pdf

National 4-H Council. (2019). Annual report 2018. Author. https://4-h.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/National-4-H-Council-FY18B-Annual-Report.pdf

National 4-H Council. (2011). 4-H national headquarters fact sheet: Essential Elements. Author. https://nifa.usda.gov/sites/default/files/resource/Essential%20Elements%20of%204-H%20v.2011.pdf

Newby, L., & Sallee, J. (2011). 4-H membership recruitment/retention problems: A meta-analysis of possible causes and solutions. Journal of Youth Development, 6(4), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2011.163

Okeke, L. (2008) Attrition in adolescent after-school programs: Addressing the concern via interviews with program dropouts. Journal of Youth Development, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2008.292

Powers, J. L., & Tiffany, J. S. (2006). Engaging youth in participatory research and evaluation. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 12, S79.

Roth, J. L., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2016). Evaluating youth development programs: Progress and promise. Applied Developmental Science, 20(3), 188-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2015.1113879

Roth, J., Brooks-Gunn, J., Murray, L., & Foster, W. (1998). Promoting healthy adolescents: Synthesis of youth development program evaluations. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8(4), 423-459.

Shernoff, D. J. (2010). Engagement in after-school programs as a predictor of social competence and academic performance. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3-4), 325-337.

Sherrod, L. R., Flanagan, C., & Youniss, J. (2002). Dimensions of citizenship and opportunities for youth development: The what, why, when, where, and who of citizenship development. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 264-272.

Torrance, H. (2012). Triangulation, respondent validation, and democratic participation in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437185

USDA Research, Education & Economics Information System. (2014). National 4-H enrollment report. https://reeis.usda.gov/reports-and-documents/4-h-reports

Weisman, S. A., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2001). Attrition from after school programs: Characteristics of students who drop out. Prevention Science, 2(3), 201–205. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011515024809

Weybright, E. H., Hrncirik, L. M., White, A. J., Cummins, M. M., Deen, M. K., & Calodich, S. (2016). “I felt really respected and I know she felt respected too”: Using youth-adult partnerships to promote positive youth development in 4-H youth. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 4(3), 93–110.

Weybright, E. H., Martinez, A. D., Varrella, G., Deen, M. K., & Wright, K. (2018). Teens as teachers: Positive outcomes and recommendations for promoting healthy nutrition in adolescents. Journal of Youth Development, 13(3), 43-60. https://jyd.pitt.edu/ojs/jyd/article/view/18-13-03-FA-02

Worker, S. M., Iaccopucci, A. M., Bird, M., & Horowitz, M. (2018). Promoting positive youth development through teenagers-as-teachers programs. Journal of Adolescent Research, 34(1), 30–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558418764089

Downloads

Published

2021-03-30

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Feature Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.