Evaluating a Statewide 4-H Volunteer Structure for Protection and Ease
Abstract
Organizations that engage volunteers to enhance and extend programs in order to meet their mission and goals often have a process to onboard individuals to serve. These processes are typically designed to provide protection to the volunteer and the organization; however, they are only as strong as the policies and procedures set in place. This article overviews one state’s process to review and revise their 4-H program’s volunteer structure to improve the consistency and cohesion of its use and the protection for all involved.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Montanari, J. R., & Bracker, J. S. (1986). The strategic management process at the public planning unit level. Strategic Management Journal, 7(3), 251-265. Wiley. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486076
Morris, J., Ashby, L., & Johnston, C. (2017). Tiered volunteer system from Maryland 4-H volunteer roles. University of Maryland.
Pleskac, S. (2010). ISOTURE Model of volunteer administration and development. National 4-H Council. https://4-h.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/ISOTURE-Model.pdf
Shmiesing, R. J., & Henderson, J. (2001). Identification of volunteer screening practices for selected Ohio youth organizations. Journal of Extension, 39(1). https://www.joe.org/joe/2001february/a2.php
Seel, K. (Ed.). (2010). Volunteer administration: professional practice. LexisNexis, Canada.
Seevers, B., Graham, D., Gamon, J., & Conklin, N. (1997). Education through Cooperative Extension. Delmar.
Tremper, C; Kostin, G. (1993). No surprises: Controlling risks in volunteer programs. Nonprofit Risk Management Center.
Vanhorn, B., Flanagan, C., & Thomson, J. (1998). The first fifty years of the 4-H program. Journal of Extension, 36(6). https://www.joe.org/joe/1998december/comm2.php
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2020.857
Copyright (c) 2020 Jamie Morris, Lacie Ashby

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.