Determinants of Motivation for Mentoring Among Adults Volunteering to Mentor Youth
Keywords:youth mentoring, ethnocultural empathy, volunteer motivation
Most youth mentoring programs rely on volunteers to serve as mentors to youth. This study investigates factors associated with motivations for volunteering in this capacity, specifically altruistic and self-oriented reasons for becoming a mentor. Because adults who volunteer as mentors and youth mentees typically come from different socio-cultural backgrounds, the study examines demographic characteristics associated with these different motivations. In addition, the study addresses the empathy-altruism hypothesis suggesting that individuals with higher levels of empathy exhibit greater altruistic tendencies. For this analysis, the focus is on ethnocultural empathy and its association with volunteer motivations. The sample consisted of 1,000 volunteers who applied to mentor in 4 agencies affiliated with a national mentoring organization. The results indicated that mentors reporting higher levels of ethnocultural empathy were more likely to endorse altruistic motivations for volunteering. Younger volunteers, female volunteers, and volunteers of color reported higher levels of self-oriented motivations for volunteering. Female mentors, in general, reported higher levels of altruistic motivations for volunteering. Altruism and empathy, particularly the ability to connect with youth across cultural differences, are considered important mentor attributes conducive to healthy mentoring relationships. The implications of these findings for research and practice are discussed.
Batson, C. D., Lishner, D. A., & Stocks, E. L. (2015). The empathy-altruism hypothesis. The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior. 259-281. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399813.013.023
Bruce, M., & Bridgeland, J. (2014). The mentoring effect: Young people’s perspectives on the outcomes and availability of mentoring. Civic Enterprise with Hart Research Associates for MENTOR: The National Mentoring Partnership. http://www.mentoring.org/images/uploads/Report_TheMentoringEffect.pdf
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2016). Volunteering in the United States 2015. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/volun.nr0.htm
Chacon, F., Vecina, M. L., & Davila, M. C. (2007). The three-stage model of volunteers’ duration of service. Social Behavior and Personality, 35(5), 627-642. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2007.35.5.627
Clary, E. G., & Orenstein, L. (1991). The amount and effectiveness of help: The relationship of motives and abilities to helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(1), 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291171009
Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J., & Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12(6), 1516-1530. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-35220.127.116.116
Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Stukas, A. A. (1996). Volunteers’ motivations: Findings from a national survey. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24(4), 485-505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764096254006
Cnaan, R. A., & Goldberg-Glen, R. S. (1991). Measuring motivation to volunteer in human services. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(3), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391273003
Cornelis, I., Van Hiel, A., & De Cremer, D. (2013). Volunteer work in youth organizations: Predicting distinct aspects of volunteering behavior from self‐ and other‐oriented motives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(2), 456-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2013.01029.x
Coursey, D., Brudney, J., Littlepage, L., & Perry, J. (2011). Does public service motivation matter in volunteering domain choices? A test of functional theory. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31(1), 48-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X10394405
Davis, M. H., Hall, J. A., & Meyer, M. (2003). The first year: Influences on the satisfaction, involvement, and persistence of new community volunteers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(2), 248-260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202239050
Dolnicar, S., & Randle, M. (2007). What motivates which volunteers? Psychographic heterogeneity among volunteers in Australia. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 18(2), 135-155.
Garinger, M., McQuillin, S., & McDaniel, H. (2017). Examining youth mentoring services across America: Findings from the 2016 national mentoring program survey. MENTOR: The National Mentoring Partnership. https://www.mentoring.org/program-resources/mentor-resources-and-publications/national-survey/
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
Haski-Leventhal, D. (2009). Altruism and volunteerism: The perceptions of altruism in four disciplines and their impact on the study of volunteerism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 39(3), 271-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00405.x
Hwang, M., Grabb, E., & Curtis, J. (2005). Why get involved? Reasons for voluntary-association activity among Americans and Canadians. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(3), 387-403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764005276435
Keller, T. E., & Spencer, R. (2017). Prediction and prevention of premature closures of mentoring relationships: The study to analyze relationships (STAR Project). U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs’ National Criminal Justice Reference Service, (Document No. 251461). https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/grants/251463.pdf
Keller, T. E. (2007). Youth mentoring: Theoretical and methodological issues. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach (pp. 23-47). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9781405133739.2007.00003.x
Liang, B., Tracy, A., Taylor, C., & Williams, L. (2002). Mentoring college‐age women: A relational approach. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 271-288. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014637112531
Lerner, R. M., Napolitano, C. M., Boyd, M. J., Mueller, M. K., & Callina, K. S. (2014). Mentoring and positive youth development. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (2nd ed., pp. 17-27). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412996907.n2
Leyton-Armakan, J., Lawrence, E., Deutsch, N., Williams, J. L., & Henneberger, A. (2012). Effective youth mentors: The relationship between initial characteristics of college women mentors and mentee satisfaction and outcome. Journal of Community Psychology, 40(8), 906-920. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21491
MENTOR/The National Mentoring Partnership. (2015). Elements of effective practice for mentoring: Research-informed and practitioner-approved best practices for creating and sustaining impactful mentoring relationships and strong program services (4th ed.). http://www.mentoring.org/program-resources/elements-of-effective-practice-for-mentoring/
Newman, D. (2014). Missing data: Five practical guidelines. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 372-411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114548590
Omoto, A. M., & Snyder, M. (1995). Sustained helping without obligation: Motivation, longevity of service, and perceived attitude change among AIDS volunteers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 671. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1681
Parent, M. (2013). Handling item-level missing data: Simpler is just as good. The Counseling Psychologist, 41(4), 568-600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012445176
Peifer, J., Lawrence, E., Williams, J., & Leyton-Armakan, J. (2016). The culture of mentoring: Ethnocultural empathy and ethnic identity in mentoring for minority girls. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22(3), 440-6. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000078
Raposa, E. B., Dietz, N., & Rhodes, J. E. (2017). Trends in volunteer mentoring in the United States: Analysis of a decade of census survey data. American Journal of Community Psychology, 1, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12117
Rasoal, C., Eklund, J., & Hansen, E. M. (2011). Toward a conceptualization of ethnocultural empathy. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 5(1), 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0099278
Sánchez, B., Colón-Torres, Y., Feuer, R., Roundfield, K. E., & Berardi, L. (2014). Race, ethnicity, and culture in mentoring relationships. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (2nd ed., pp. 145-158). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976664.n13
Sherman, A., & Shavit, T. (2012). How the lifecycle explains volunteering during retirement. Ageing and Society, 32(8), 1360-1381. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X11000997
Silverberg, K., Compton, D., & Coco-Ripp, J. (2003). Motivations of ethnie minorities who volunteer in programs that target under-served youth. World Leisure Journal, 45(3), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/04419057.2003.9674325
Spencer, R., Drew, A. L., Walsh, J., & Kanchewa, S. A. (2018). Girls (and boys) just want to have fun: A mixed methods study of gender differences in youth mentoring relationship duration. Journal of Primary Prevention, 39(1), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-017-0494-3
Spencer, R., Basualdo-Delmonico, A., & Lewis, T. O. (2011). Working to make it work: The role of parents in the youth mentoring process. Journal of Community Psychology, 39(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20416
Stukas, A. A., Clary, E. G., & Snyder, M. (2014). Mentor recruitment and retention. In D. L. Dubois, & M. K. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of Youth Mentoring, 2nd Edition (pp. 397-410). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412996907.n27
Wang, Y., Davidson, M. M., Yakushko, O. F., Savoy, H. B., Tan, J. A., & Bleier, J. K. (2003). The scale of ethnocultural empathy: Development, validation, and reliability. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(2), 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-022.214.171.124
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.