Are Volunteers Competent in Positive Youth Development? Perceptions From Three Stakeholder Groups

Authors

  • Dustin Homan Ohio State University Extension, 4-H Youth Development
  • Hannah K. Epley Ohio State University Extension, 4-H Youth Development
  • Kirk L. Bloir Ohio State University Extension, 4-H Youth Development

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2020.742

Keywords:

volunteer management, competency, performance, training

Abstract

Some youth organizations entrust adult volunteers with delivering programs and forging relationships with youth clientele. As a result, volunteers should be competent in certain knowledge, skills, and abilities that catalyze positive youth development processes to occur. This research expands upon the results of an initial study designed to address shortcomings of a volunteer competency framework. Our objective for this study was to assess and compare the discrepancies between importance and ability-to-perform ratings of adult volunteers across 6 competency areas from the Volunteer Research Knowledge Competency Taxonomy. Over 10,000 youth professionals, adult volunteers, and families of youth members responded to an online survey. Respondents rated the importance of, and volunteers’ performance in the 6 competency areas; they also provided input about the modalities they preferred for delivering training and resources. Performance means varied across the 3 groups: Volunteers’ overall performance means were the highest, followed by families, and then professionals. Mean weighted discrepancy scores were calculated to compare the importance and performance rankings across respondent groups. Based on the scores, future volunteer trainings and resources should be prioritized around the competency areas of organization, positive youth development, program management, and communication. Volunteers also preferred more self-directed approaches for future trainings. Results from this study suggest that the volunteer competency taxonomy is still a valid framework and affirms other youth worker competency frameworks. The results also help establish a baseline of data that can be used to see if future training interventions and resources are perceived as effective.

Author Biographies

Dustin Homan, Ohio State University Extension, 4-H Youth Development

4-H Extension Educator, Purdue University Extension-Marion County

Hannah K. Epley, Ohio State University Extension, 4-H Youth Development

Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist, 4-H Youth Development - OSU Extension

Kirk L. Bloir, Ohio State University Extension, 4-H Youth Development

Assistant Director and State 4-H Leader, 4-H Youth Development - OSU Extension

References

Albright, M. B., & Ferrari, T. M. (2010). “Push” and "pull” a qualitative study of factors that contribute to older youth leaving the 4-H program. Journal of Youth Development, 5(3), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2010.209

Astroth, K. A., Garza, P., & Taylor, B. (2004). Getting down to business: Defining competencies for entry-level youth workers. New Directions for Youth Development, 104, 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.96

Benson, P. L. (2007). Developmental assets: An overview of theory, research, and practice. In R. Silbereisen & R. Lerner (Eds.), Approaches to Positive Youth Development (pp. 33–58). SAGE.

Borich, G. D. (1980). A needs assessment model for conducting follow-up studies. Journal of Teacher Education, 31(3), 39-42.

Culp, K., McKee, R. K., & Nestor, P. (2007). Identifying volunteer core competencies: Regional differences. Journal of Extension, 45(6). http://www.joe.org/joe/2007december/a3p.shtml

Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys. John Wiley & Sons.

Eccles, J. & Gootman, J. (Eds.). (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. National Academy Press.

Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1086/209351

Fogarty, K., Terry, B., Pracht, D., & Jordan, J. (2009). Organizational supports and youth life skill development: Adult volunteers as mentors, managers and “mediators.” Journal of Youth Development, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2009.239

-H National Headquarters. (2017). Growing together: 4-H professional, research, knowledge and competencies 2017. https://nifa.usda.gov/sites/default/files/resources/4-H-PRKC-2017-guide.pdf

Guerra, N. G., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2008). Linking the prevention of problem behaviors and positive youth development: Core competencies for positive youth development and risk prevention. In N. G. Guerra & C. P. Bradshaw (Eds.), Core competencies to prevent problem behaviors and promote positive youth development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 122, 1–17.

Hein, W., White, T., & Williams, J. (2016). Successful use of Extension and online training modules in mandatory biennial volunteer recertification. Journal of Youth Development, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2016.464

Hobbs, S. (2012). The latest approach to volunteer recruitment. In T. D. Connors (Ed.), The volunteer management handbook: Leadership strategies for success (pp. 203-225). John Wiley & Sons.

Homan, D. M., Bloir, K. L., & Epley, H. K. (2017). Evaluating volunteer competencies to achieve organizational goals. International Journal of Volunteer Administration, 32(2), 35–49. https://www.ijova.org/docs/Full_Issue_November_2017_(1).pdf

Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., & Colleagues. (2013). The positive development of youth: Comprehensive findings from the 4-H study of positive youth development. National 4-H Council.

Miller, L. E., & Smith, K. L. (1983). Handling nonresponse issues. Journal of Extension, 21(5). https://www.joe.org/joe/1983september/83-5-a7.pdf

National AfterSchool Association. (2011). Core knowledge and competencies for afterschool and youth development professionals. https://naaweb.org/resources/core-competencies

National 4-H Council. (n.d.-a). Volunteer research knowledge and competency lesson plans. Author. https://4-h.org/professionals/professional-development/volunteer-development/#!vrkc-model-lesson-plans

National 4-H Council. (n.d.-b). Volunteer research knowledge and competency taxonomy for 4-H youth development. Author.

Padgett, D. K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research–second edition. SAGE.

Radhakrishna, R., & Doamekpor, P. (2008). Strategies for generalizing findings in survey research. Journal of Extension, 46(2). https://www.joe.org/joe/2008april/tt1.php

Radhakrishna, R., & Ewing, J. C. (2011). Relationships between 4-H volunteer leader competencies and skills youth learn in 4-H programs. Journal of Extension, 49(4). https://www.joe.org/joe/2011august/rb2.php

Shippmann, J. S., Ash, R. A., Battista, M., Carr, L., Eyde, L. D., Hesketh, B., Kehoe, J., Pearlman, K., Prien, E. P., & Sanchez, J. I. (2000). The practice of competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 53, 703-740.

Singletary, L., Smith, M., & Evans, W. P. (2006). Self-perceived 4-H leader competencies and their relation to the skills youth learn through 4-H youth development programs. Journal of Extension, 44(4). http://www.joe.org/joe/2006august/rb2.php

Smith, C., Akiva, T., Arrieux, D., & Jones, M. M. (2006). Improving quality at the point of service. In D.A. Blyth & J.A. Walker (Eds.), Rethinking programs for youth in the middle years. New Directions for Student Leadership, 112, 93-108.

Yohalem, N. (2003). Adults who make a difference: Identifying the skills and characteristics of successful youth workers. Community youth development: Programs, policies, and practices, 358-372.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-15

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 4 (2020): Special Issue on Volunteerism in Youth Development Programs

Section

Special Issue Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.