Summer Camp Youth Leadership Development: An Investigation of Adolescents’ Perceptions of Best Practices

Authors

  • Katlyn Martin McGill University; Indiana University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2018.536

Keywords:

youth development, leadership, camp

Abstract

This qualitative study explored adolescent participants’ perceptions of the Leaders-in-Training (LIT) program at Waycross Camp, a residential summer camp. The main data set was collected through interviews with former LIT program participants. A constant comparison data analysis of LIT program feedback revealed four emergent themes: (a) bridging the gap, (b) giving permission to be human, (c) rolling up your sleeves, and (d) serving the greater good. Each theme yielded an outcome, including (a) community, (b) openness, (c) empowerment, and (d) character, respectively. Concepts depicted in relevant literature were synthesized with these four themes and outcomes, yielding (a) social relationships; (b) identity and self-image; (c) agency and engagement; and (d) spirituality, ethicality, and morality, respectively. Together, these themes, outcomes, and concepts were integrated to produce a camp-based model of youth leadership development that reflected participant feedback on the LIT program’s best practices. Implications for future practice are discussed.

References

Berzonsky, M. D. (2004). Identity processing style, self-construction, and personal epistemic assumptions: A social-cognitive perspective. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1(4), 303-315.

Bialeschki, M. D., Henderson, K. A., & James, P. A. (2007). Camp experiences and developmental outcomes for youth. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 16, 769-788.

Bialeschki, M. D., Krehbiel, A., & Henderson, K. (2002). Outcomes of camping: Perceptions from camper focus groups. Research in Outdoor Education, 6, 147-156.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Butler-Kisber, L. (2010). Qualitative inquiry: Thematic, narrative, and arts-informed perspectives. London, UK: Sage.

Cargo, M., Grams, G. D., Ottoson, J. M., Ward, P., & Green, L. W. (2003). Empowerment as fostering positive youth development and citizenship. American Journal Health Behavior, 27(1), S66-S79.

Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L, Ryan, J. A. M., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 98-124.

Crooks, D. L. (2001). The importance of symbolic interaction in grounded theory research on women’s health. Health Care for Women International, 22, 11-27.

Damon, W., Menon, J., & Cotton Bronk, K. (2003). The development of purpose during adolescence. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 119-128.

Daniel, B. (2007). The life significance of a spiritually oriented, Outward Bound-type wilderness expedition. The Journal of Experiential Education, 29(3), 386–389.

Dawes, N. P., & Larson, R. (2011). How youth get engaged: Grounded-theory research on motivational development in organized youth programs. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 259-269.

Day, S. (2012). A reflexive lens: Exploring dilemmas of qualitative methodology through the concept of reflexivity. Qualitative Sociology Review, 8(1), 61-85.

Eccles, J. S., Barber, B. L., Stone, M., & Hunt, J. (2003). Extracurricular activities and adolescent development. Journal of Social Issues, 59(4), 865-889.

Ferrari, T. M., & McNeely, N. N. (2007). Positive youth development: What’s camp counseling got to do with it? Findings from a study of Ohio 4-H camp counselors. Journal of Extension, 45(2).

Fink, A. (2005). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Garst, B. A., Browne, L. P., & Bialeschki, M. D. (2011). Youth development and the camp experience. New Directions for Youth Development, 130, 73-87.

Garst, B. A., & Bruce, F. A. (2003). Identifying 4-H camping outcomes using a standardized evaluation process across multiple 4-H educational centers. Journal of Extension, 41(3).

Garst, B. A., Franz, N. K., Peters, B., Smith, C., & Baughman, S. (2012). Using single-case participatory action research as a methodology to explore Appalachian summer camp communities. PRISM: A Journal of Regional Engagement, 1(1), 19-31.

Garst, B. A., & Johnson, J. (2005). Adolescent leadership skill development through residential 4-H camp counseling. Journal of Extension, 43(5).

Garton, M. S., Miltenberger, M., & Pruett, B. (2007). Does 4-H camp influence life skill and leadership development? Journal of Extension, 45(4).

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, Canada: Transaction.

Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2013). Life with and without coding: Two methods for early-stage data analysis in qualitative research aiming at causal explanations. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(2).

Hastings, L. J., Barrett, L. A., Barbuto, J. E., & Bell, L. C. (2011). Developing a paradigm model of youth leadership development and community engagement: A grounded theory. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(1), 19-29.

Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hatry, H., van Houten, T., Plantz, M. C., & Taylor, M. (1996). Measuring program outcomes: A practical approach. Alexandria, VA: United Way of America.

Heintzman, P. (2009). Nature-based recreation and spirituality: A complex relationship. Leisure Sciences, 32(1), 72-89.

Henderson, K. A., Bialeschki, M. D., & James, P. A. (2007a). Overview of camp research. Child Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 16, 755-767.

Henderson, K. A., Bialeschki, M. D., Scanlin, M. M., Thurber, C., Whitaker, L. S., & Marsh, P. E. (2007b). Components of camp experiences for positive youth development. Journal of Youth Development, 1(3), 1-12.

Henderson, K. A., Whitaker, L. S., Bialeschki, M. D., Scanlin, M. M., & Thurber, C. (2007c). Summer camp experiences: Parental perceptions of youth development outcomes. Journal of Family Issues, 28(8), 987-1007.

Hendricks, M., Plantz, M. C., & Pritchard, K. J. (2008). Measuring outcomes of United Way–funded programs: Expectations and reality. New Directions for Evaluation, 119, 13–35.

Hill, E., & Sibthorp, J. (2006). Autonomy support at diabetes camp: A self determination theory approach to therapeutic recreation. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 40(2), 107-125.

Hsuing, P. C. (2010). Reflexivity: A process of reflection. Retrieved from http://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/~pchsiung/LAL/reflexivity

Khandkar, S. H. (2009). Open coding. Retrieved from http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~saul/wiki/uploads/CPSC681/opencoding.pdf

Klau, M. (2006). Exploring youth leadership in theory and practice. New Directions for Youth Development, 109, 57-87.

Larson, R. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55, 170–183.

Lerner, R. M., Almerigi, J. B., Theokas, C., & Lerner, J. V. (2005). Positive youth development: A view of the issues. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 10-16.

Marsh, P. E. (1999). What does camp do for kids? A meta-analysis of the influence of organized camping experience on the self constructs of youth. Unpublished Master of Science thesis, Department of Recreation and Park Administration, Indiana University, IN.

Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. London, UK: Sage.

Maykut, P. S., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. London, UK: Falmer Press.

Meier, J. F., & Henderson, K. A. (2011). Camp counseling: Leadership and programming for the organized camp. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

Mills-Scofield, D. (2012, November 26). It’s not just semantics: Managing outcomes vs. outputs. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2012/11/its-not-just-semantics-managing-outcomes

Ramsing, R., & Sibthorp, J. (2008). The role of autonomy support in summer camp programs: Preparing youth for productive behaviors. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 26(2), 61-77.

Rinn, A. N. (2006). Effects of a summer program on the social self-concepts of gifted adolescents. Prufrock Journal, 17(2), 65-75.

Roberts, B. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2001). The kids are alright: Growth and stability in personality development from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 670-683.

Roth, J. L., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). What exactly is a youth development program? Answers from research and practice. Applied Developmental Science, 7(2), 94-111.

Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63-75.

Sweatman, M. M., & Heintzman, P. (2004). The perceived impact of outdoor residential camp experience on the spirituality of youth. World Leisure Journal, 46(1), 23-31.

Thomas, H. (1996). Youth leadership: Teaching essential proficiencies at camp. The Camping Magazine, 68(4), 25-27.

Thurber, C. A., Scanlin, M. M., Scheuler, L., & Henderson, K. A. (2007). Youth development outcomes of the camp experience: Evidence for multidimensional growth. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 36, 241-254.

Waycross Camp and Conference Center. (2014). Session information. Retrieved from http://waycrosscenter.org/session-information/

Williams, G. C., Freedman, Z. R., & Deci, E. L. (1998). Supporting autonomy to motivate patients with diabetes for glucose control. Diabetes Care, 10, 1644-1651.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-20

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 1-2 (2018): Special Issue on Camp Experience

Section

Feature Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.