Restorative Youth Sports: An Applied Model for Resolving Conflicts and Building Positive Relationships

Authors

  • Michael A. Hemphill University of North Carolina at Greensboro
  • Emily M. Janke University of North Carolina at Greensboro
  • Barrie Gordon Victoria University of Wellington
  • Haley Farrar Victoria University of Wellington

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2018.603

Keywords:

sport-based youth development, teaching responsibility, restorative practices, youth sports

Abstract

When handled effectively, conflict provides opportunities to strengthen relationships and assist youth in developing peaceful conflict resolution skills. Sport participation is one context in which youth develop skills and encounter conflict. The purpose of this study was to develop an applied model that addresses conflict resolution in sport-based youth development programs. Using qualitative interviewing, a community-engaged approach guided the selection of participants and data analysis. We used the models of restorative practice and Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility (TPSR) through sports to guide our study. Following interviews with a variety of community partners, we found that the values of sport are often in conflict with restorative practices. However, a relational approach such as TPSR aligns well with the values of restorative practices. Based on our findings, an applied model was developed to illustrate how restorative practice can be utilized in a sport context. The Restorative Youth Sports (RYS) model recognizes that conflicts and tension are natural and inherent to all relationships. When handled appropriately, conflict provides opportunities to strengthen relationships. Youth sport provides a unique context where youth are presented with problems and conflicts to solve and promote healthy relationships among youth.

Author Biography

Michael A. Hemphill, University of North Carolina at Greensboro

Michael A Hemphill is assistant professor in the deparmtent of Kinesiology at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro

References

Benson, P. L., & Scales, P. C. (2009). Positive youth development and the prevention of youth aggression and violence. International Journal of Developmental Science, 3(3), 218-234. doi: 10. 3233/DEV-2009-3302

Boyd, S., & Felgate, R. (2015). A positive culture of support: Final report from the evaluation of PB4L school-wide. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.

Bringle, R. G., Clayton, P. H., & Price, M. F. (2009). Partnerships in service learning and civic engagement. Partnerships: A Journal of Service Learning & Civic Engagement, 1(1), 1-20.

Buckle, M. E., & Walsh, D. S. (2013). Teaching responsibility to gang-affiliated youths. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 84(2), 53-58. doi: 10.1080/07303084.2013.757193

Community-Campus Partnerships for Health. (2006). Principles of good community-campus partnerships. Seattle, WA: Author.

Dostilio, L. D., Brackmann, S. M., Edwards, K. E., Harrison, B., Kliewer, B. W., & Clayton, P. H. (2012). Reciprocity: Saying what we mean and meaning what we say. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 19(1), 17-32. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3239521.0019.102

Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564

Escarti, A., Llopis-Goig, R., & Wright, P. M. (2018). Assessing the implementation fidelity of a school-based teaching personal and social responsibility program in physical education and other subject areas. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.2016-0200

Evans, K., & Vaandering, D. (2016). The little book of restorative justice in education: Fostering responsibility, healing, and hope in schools. New York, NY: Good Books.

Farey, T., & Solomon, J. (2017). State of play 2017: Trends and developments. Aspen, CO: The Aspen Institute.

Fraser-Thomas, J. L., Cote, J., & Deakin, J. (2005). Youth sport programs: An avenue to foster positive youth development. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 10(1), 19-40. doi: 10.1080/1740898042000334890

Gordon, B. (2010). An examination of the responsibility model in a New Zealand secondary school physical education program. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 21-37. doi: 10.1123/jtpe/29.1.21

Gordon, B., Jacobs, J. M., & Wright, P. M. (2016). Social and emotional learning through a teaching personal and social responsibility based after-school program for disengaged middle school boys. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 35, 358-369. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.2016-0106

Gregory, A., Clawson, K., Davis, A., & Gerewitz, J. (2015). The promise of restorative practices to transform teacher-student relationships and achieve equity in school discipline. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 25(1), 1-29. doi: 10.1080/10474412.2014.929950

Hellison, D. (2011). Teaching responsibility through physical activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Hellison, D., Martinek, T., & Cutforth, N. (1996). Beyond violence prevention in inner-city physical activity programs. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 2(4), 321-337. doi: 10.1207/s15327949pac0204

Hemphill, M. A., & Martinek, T. (2017). Community engagement through sport: University partnership to promote youth development. Kinesiology Review, 6, 311-316. doi: 10.1123/kr.2017-0027

Hemphill, M. A., Templin, T. J., & Wright, P. M. (2015). Implementation and outcomes of a responsibility-based continuing professional development protocol in physical education. Sport, Education, and Society, 20(3), 398-419. doi: 10.108013573322.2012

Holt, N. L., Neely, K. C., Slater, L. G., Camire, M., Cote, J., Fraser-Thomas, J., MacDonald, D., Strachan, L., & Tamminen, K. A. (2017). A grounded theory of positive youth development through sport based on results from a qualitative meta-study. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10(1), 1-49. doi: 10.1080/1750984X.2016.1180704

Jameson, J., Clayton, P., & Jaeger, A. (2010). Community engaged scholarship as mutually transformative partnerships. In L. Harter, J. Hamel-Lambert, & J. Millesen (Eds.), Participatory partnerships for social action and research (pp. 259-277). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.

Janke, E. M., & Clayton, P. H. (2011). Excellence in community engagement and community-engaged scholarship: Advancing the discourse at UNCG (Vol. 1). Greensboro: University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

Lederach, J. P. (2003). The little book of conflict transformation. New York, NY: Good Books.

Lee, O., & Martinek, T. (2009). Navigating two cultures: An investigation of cultures of a responsibility-based physical activity program and school. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80(2), 230-240. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2009.10599557

Lewis, S. (2009). Improving school climate: Findings from schools implementing restorative practices. Bethlehem, PA: International Institute for Restorative Practices.

Macready, T. (2009). Learning social responsibility in schools: A restorative practice. Educational Psychology in Practice, 25(3), 211-220. doi: 10.1080/02667360903151767

Martinek, T. (2016). Project Effort: Creating responsible leadership through values-based learning. Active and Healthy Magazine, 23, 43-46.

Martinek, T., & Hellison, D. (2009). Youth leadership in sport and physical education. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Martinek, T., & Hellison, D. (2016). Learning responsibility through physical activity. In N. L. Holt (Ed.), Positive youth development through sport (2nd ed., pp. 180-190). New York, NY: Routledge.

Martinek, T., Schilling, T., & Johnson, D. (2001). Evaluation of a sport and mentoring program designed to foster personal and social responsibility in underserved youth. The Urban Review 33(1), 29-45. doi: 10.1023/A:101033281

Morrison, B., Blood, P., & Thorsborne, M. (2005). Practicing restorative justice in school communities: The challenge of culture change. Public Organization Review, 5(4), 335-357. doi: 10.1007/s1115-005-5095-6

New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2014). Positive behaviour for learning: Restorative practice kete. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.

New Zealand Ministry of Justice. (2011). Restorative justice: Best practices in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.

Nilson, P. (2015). Making sense of implementation theories, models, and frameworks. Implementation Science, 10(53). doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0

Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327-344. doi: 10.1080.13645570701401305

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Rahim, M. A., (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368-376. doi: 10.2307/255985

Richards, K. A. R., & Hemphill, M. A. (2018). A practical guide to collaborative qualitative data analysis. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(2), 225-231. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.2017-0084

Riley, A., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2012). Participation in a summer sport-based youth development program for disadvantaged youth: Getting the parent perspective. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(7), 1367-1377. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.03.008

Roehlkepartain, E., Pekel, K., Syvertsen, A., Sethi, J., Sullivan, T., & Scales, P. (2017). Relationships first: Creating connections that help youth people thrive. Minneapolis, MN: Search Institute.

Rofe, C., Stewart, M., & Wood, M. (2016). Improving student’s engagement: Changing classroom discourse using teacher restorative professional development. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 7, 223-239. doi: 10.1504/IJTCS.2016.080933

Roloff, M. E. (2009). Links between conflict management research and practice. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(4), 339-348. doi: 1080/00909880903233200

Saltmarsh, J., Hartley, M., & Clayton, P. (2009). Democratic engagement white paper. Boston, MA: New England Resource Center for Higher Education. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/274

Search Institute. (2018). The developmental relationships framework. Minneapolis, MN: Author.

Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Siffert, A., & Schwarz, B. (2011). Parental conflict resolution styles and children’s adjustment: Children’s appraisals and emotion regulation as mediators. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 172(1), 21-39. doi: 10. 1080/00221325.2010.503723

Smith, D., Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2015). Better than carrots or sticks: Restorative practices for positive classroom management. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Sport New Zealand. (2015). Community sport: Strategy 2015-20. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.

Volkema, R. J., & Bergmann, T. J. (1995). Conflict styles as indicators of behavioral patterns in interpersonal conflicts. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135(1), 5-15. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1995.9711395

Walsh, D. (2008). Helping youth in underserved communities envision possible futures. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79(2), 209-221. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2008.10599484

Wright, P. M., Li, W., Ding, S., & Pickering, M. (2010). Integrating a personal and social responsibility program into a wellness course for urban high school students: Assessing implementation and educational outcomes. Sport, Education, and Society, 15(3), 277-298. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2010.493309

Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-18

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2018): Special Issue on Youth Health and Well-Being

Section

Feature Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.