Guiding Principles for Reaching and Engaging Latinx Youth in Youth Development Programs

Fe Moncloa, Nancy Erbstein, Aarti Subramaniam, Claudia Diaz Carrasco

Abstract


This qualitative study presents practices associated with sustained youth engagement at 13 Latinx-serving youth development programs located in 3 California counties: 1 rural, 1 suburban and 1 urban. Empirical findings reflect 5 key dimensions of practice: (a) integrate extended understandings of positive youth development, (b) support positive ethnic identity development, (c) contend with physiological and social effects of discrimination, (d) respond to the ramifications of economic poverty, and (e) act upon the diversity of local and regional Latinx experience. Study findings translate into guiding principles that youth development programs are encouraged to operationalize based on local interests, needs, and resources.


Keywords


immigrant and Latino youth development; youth programs

Full Text:

PDF

References


California Department of Education (2018). 2017-18 Enrollment by ethnicity and grade [Data file]. Retrieved from https://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/dqcensus/EnrEthGrd.aspx?cds=00&agglevel=state&year=2017-18

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Edwards, L. M., & Romero, A. J. (2008). Coping with discrimination among Mexican descent adolescents. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 30(1), 24-39. doi:10.1177/0739986307311431

Erbstein, N. (2013). Engaging underrepresented youth populations in community youth development: Tapping social capital as a critical resource. New Directions for Youth Development, 2013: 109-124. doi:10.1002/yd.20061

Erbstein, N., & Fabionar, J. (2014). Latin@ youth participation in youth development programs. Davis, CA: University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Retrieved from http://cesantaclara.ucanr.edu/files/261436.pdf

Erbstein, N., Moncloa, F., Olagundoye, S. S., Diaz Carrasco, C., & Hill, R. (2017). Engaging Latino Communities from the Ground Up: Three Tools. Journal of Extension, 55:6. Article 4TOT3 https://joe.org/joe/2017august/tt3.php

Gambone, M. A., & Connell, J. P. (2004). The community action framework for youth development. Prevention Researcher, 11(2), 17-20.

Koball, H., & Jiang, Y. (2018). Basic Facts About Low-Income Children: Children Under 18 Years (2016). New York, NY: National Center for Children in Poverty, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. Retrieved from

Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V, Lewin-Bizan, S., Bowers, E. P., Boyd, M. J., Mueller, M. K., Schmid, K. L., Napolitano, C. M.(2011). Positive youth development: Processes, programs, and problematics. Journal of Youth Development, 6(3): 40-64

Moncloa, F; Horrillo, S.; Diaz-Carrasco, C.; Espinoza, D.; Hill, R.; Soule, K. (2018). Using a Translational Process to Apply Latino Youth Development Research Findings in Practice. Journal of Extension. 56:6. Article 6IAW3. https://joe.org/joe/2018october/pdf/JOE_v56_6iw3.pdf

National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2002). Community Programs to Promote Youth Development. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. (pp. 605-28). doi: 10.17226/1022

Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative Research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Phinney, J. S. (1989). Stages of ethnic identity development in minority group adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 9(1-2), 34-49. Doi: 10.177/0272431689091004

Romero, M., London, J., & Erbstein, N. (2010). Opportunities and challenges for youth civic engagement. Healthy Youth/Healthy Regions Working Paper. Davis: University of California, Davis, Center for Regional Change. Retrieved from https://regionalchange.ucdavis.edu/sites/g/files/dgvnsk986/files/inline-files/Youth_Civic_Engagement.pdf

Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Spencer, M. B., Swanson, D. P. & Harpalani, V. (2015). Conceptualizing the self: Contributions of normative human processes, diverse contexts and social opportunity. In Lamb, M., Coll, C. G., & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 750-793). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Stanton-Salazar, R. D. (2011). A social capital framework for the study of institutional agents and their role in the empowerment of low-status students and youth. Youth and Society, 43, 1066–1109. doi: 10.1177/0044118X10382877

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

United States Census Bureau (2017). Profile American Facts for Features, Hispanic Heritage Month 2017. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/newsroom/facts-for-features/2017/cb17-ff17.pdf

University of California 4-H Youth Development Program (2013). Club Ethnicity and Gender (Youth): By State 2012-2013 [Data file]. Retrieved from https://www.4honline.com/Manager/Report/Management.aspx




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2019.679

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Fe Moncloa, Nancy Erbstein, Aarti Subramaniam, Claudia Diaz Carrasco

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.