Summer Camp as a Force for 21st Century Learning: Exploring Divergent Thinking and Activity Selection in a Residential Camp Setting

Myles L. Lynch, C. Boyd Hegarty, Nate Trauntvein, Jonathan A. Plucker


This study investigated change in divergent thinking (DT), an indicator of creative potential, at two gender-specific residential summer camps. Additionally, this study examined whether the change in DT varied by gender and by the type of activities campers self-select. Quantitative methods, using a quasi-experimental design was used in order to understand differences in camper scores. A total of 189 youth, 100 girls, 89 boys, between the ages of 9 and 14 years participated in the current study. Participants were administered a modified version of Guilford's (1967) alternate uses task, a measure of DT, in which respondents were asked questions such as name all of the uses for a brick or name all of the uses for a plate before the camp session started, and then again at the end of the two-week session. Results indicate overall mean significant increases in DT across all scoring methods of fluency, flexibility, and originality. Participants who self-selected one or more artistic activities (e.g., drama, arts and crafts, dance) had significant increases on the tasks as opposed to participants who did not select any artistic activities (e.g., basketball, baseball, archery). Finally, girls significantly increased across all scoring methods, whereas boys slightly increased in fluency and flexibility but not in originality. These results indicate residential summer camp may provide a creativity "benefit" for youth in attendance, especially those who participate in certain activities. Practitioners should use this study to understand their own programming in terms of creativity, activity offerings, and camp culture.



divergent thinking; creativity; summer camp; activity selection

Full Text:



American Camp Association. (n.d). Facts and Trends. Retrieved from

Amabile, T. M., & Gitomer, J. (1984). Children's artistic creativity effects of choice in task materials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10(2), 209-215.

Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469-480.

Atchley, R. A., Strayer, D. L., & Atchley, P. (2012). Creativity in the wild: Improving creative reasoning through immersion in natural settings. PloS ONE, 7 (12),

Baer, J. (2014). Creativity and divergent thinking: A task-specific approach. London: Psychology Press.

Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75-105.

Brown, S. L. & Vaughan, C. (2009). Play: How it shapes the brain, opens the imagination, and invigorates the soul. New York, NY: Penguin.

Cartwright, G. F., Tabatabai, D., Beaudoin, M. C., & Naidoo, L. (2000). Self-actualization of youth in a summer camp. Psychological reports, 87(3), 729-730.

Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity research journal, 18(3), 391-404.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.). (1999). Handbook of creativity (pp. 313-336). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rathunde, K. (1993). The measurement of flow in everyday life: Toward a theory of emergent motivation. In J. E. Jacobs (Ed.), Current theory and research in motivation, Vol. 40. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1992. Developmental perspectives on motivation (pp. 57-97). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Feist, G. J. (2010). The function of personality in creativity: The nature and nurture of the creative personality. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 113-130). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2014). The history of self-determination theory in psychology and management. In M. Gagné (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory, (pp. 1-9). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Garst, B. A., & Bruce, F. A. (2003). Identifying 4-H camping outcomes using a standardized evaluation process across multiple 4-H educational centers. Journal of Extension, 41(3), 1-7.

Goor, A., & Rapoport, T. (1977). Enhancing creativity in an informal educational framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(5), 636-643. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.69.5.636

Guilford, J.P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hegarty, C. B. (2009). The value and meaning of creative leisure. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(1), 10-13.

Henderson, K. A., Bialeschki, M. D., & James, P. A. (2007). Overview of camp research. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 16(4), 755-767.

Hill, E., & Sibthorp, J. (2006). Autonomy support at diabetes camp: a self-determination theory approach to therapeutic recreation. Therapeutic recreation journal, 40(2), 107.

Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. New York, NY: Wiley.

Kim, K. H. (2011). The creativity crisis: The decrease in creative thinking scores on the Torrance tests of creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 23(4), 285-295. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.627805.

Lubart, T. I. (1999). Creativity across cultures. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.) Handbook of creativity (pp. 339-550). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258-1265. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258

Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83-96.

Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In E. L. Grigorenko & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 153-167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Plucker, J. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2015). What we know about creativity. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Retrieved from

Ramsing, R., & Sibthorp, J. (2008). The role of autonomy support in summer camp programs: Preparing youth for productive behaviors. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration, 26(2), 61-77.

Russ, S. W. (2014). Pretend play in childhood: Foundation of adult creativity. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Russ, S. W., Robins, A.L., & Christiano, B.A. (1999). Pretend play: Longitudinal prediction of creativity and affect in fantasy in children. Creativity Research Journal, 12(2), 129-139.

Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2015). Creative schools: The grassroots revolution that’s transforming education. New York, NY: Viking Press.

Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Sheets, Ann, (2013). Nurture Creativity at Camp. Retrieved from

Starko, A. J. (1995). Creativity in the classroom. White Plains, NY: Longman.

Thomas, N. G., & Berk, L. E. (1981). Effects of school environments on the development of young children's creativity. Child Development, 52(4), 1153-1162.

Thurber, C. A., Scanlin, M. M., Scheuler, L., & Henderson, K. A. (2007). Youth development outcomes of the camp experience: Evidence for multidimensional growth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(3), 241-254.

Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the work-related Basic Need Satisfaction scale. Competence, and relatedness at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 981-1002.

Van Slyck, A. A. (2006). A manufactured wilderness: Summer camps and the shaping of American youth, 1890-1960. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Myles L Lynch, C Boyd Hegarty, Nate Trauntvein, Jonathan Plucker

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.