Implementing Sexual Violence Primary Prevention Programs: A Case Study of Implementer Perspectives

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2022.1272

Keywords:

sexual violence prevention, program implementation, community-based organizations, university-based programming, primary prevention

Abstract

Sexual violence prevention programs are important for addressing sexual violence and are often implemented in local community and university settings. However, program implementer perspectives are often missing from academic research literature, limiting access to practical knowledge that can provide insights to improving programs and prevention. This study illustrates the landscape of sexual violence primary prevention work in a Midwestern metropolitan area. Seven interviews with community and university implementers took place in 2020, providing information about local prevention programs and expert insights to community prevention culture. Geographic data about implementation locations was also collected to visually assess coverage of preventive services and confirm that the major sub-areas of the metropolitan area were represented by this research. Interviews provided descriptions of local programs implemented with adolescents and young adults which usually took place in school or university settings and focused on healthy relationships. Capacity was most often cited as a challenge faced internally, whereas broader outer contexts may inhibit or support prevention externally. Findings capture the perspectives of sexual violence prevention program implementers, including discussion of tensions related to adaptation versus fidelity and how implementation contexts specific to this programming may influence implementation.

Author Biographies

Jacinda K. Dariotis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Department of Human Development and Family Studies

Bonnie S. Fisher, University of Cincinnati

School of Criminal Justice

References

Basile, K. C., Lang, K. S., Bartenfeld, T. A., & Clinton-Sherrod, M. (2005). Evaluability assessment of the Rape Prevention and Education Program: Summary of findings and recommendations. Journal of Women’s Health, 14(3), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2005.14.201

Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., Chen, J., & Stevens, M. R. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention https://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf

Boba, R., & Lilley, D. (2009). Violence against women act (VAWA) funding: A nationwide assessment of effects on rape and assault. Violence Against Women, 15(2), 168–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801208329146

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chambers, D. A., Glasgow, R. E., & Stange, K. C. (2013). The dynamic sustainability framework: Addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implementation Science, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-117

Coker, A. L., Bush, H. M., Cook-Craig, P. G., DeGue, S. A., Clear, E. R., Brancato, C. J., Fisher, B. S., Recktenwald, E. A. (2017). RCT testing bystander effectiveness to reduce violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(5), 566–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.020

Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50

Damschroder, L. J., Reardon, C. M., Opra Widerquist, M. A., & Lowery, J. (2022). Conceptualizing outcomes for use with the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR): The CFIR outcomes addendum. Implementation Science, 17(7), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01181-5

Dariotis, J. K., Bumbarger, B. K., Duncan, L. G., & Greenberg, M. T. (2008). How do implementation efforts relate to program adherence? Examining the role of organizational, implementer, and program factors. Journal of Community Psychology, 36(6), 744–760. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20255

Davidov, D. M., Hill, K., Bush, H. M., & Coker, A. L. (2020). The green light for Green Dot: A qualitative study of factors influencing adoption of an efficacious violence prevention program in high school settings. Violence Against Women, 26(12-13), 1701–1726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219886377

DeGue, S., Niolon, P. H., Estefan, L. F., Tracy, A. J., Le, V. D., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Little, T. D., Latzman, N. E., Tharp, A., Lang, K. M., & Taylor, B. (2020). Effects of dating matters® on sexual violence and sexual harassment outcomes among middle school youth: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Prevention Science, 22(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01152-0

DeGue, S., Simon, T. R., Basile, K. C., Yee, S. L., Lang, K., & Spivak, H. (2012). Moving forward by looking back: Reflecting on a decade of CDC's work in sexual violence prevention, 2000–2010. Journal of Women's Health, 21(12), 1211–1218. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2012.3973

DeGue, S., Valle, L. A., Holt, M. K., Massetti, G. M., Matjasko, J. L., & Tharp, A. T. (2014). A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(4), 346-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.05.004

Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3-4), 327-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0

Edwards, K. M., Waterman, E. A., Lee, K. D. M., Himlin, L., Parm, K., & Banyard, V. L. (2019). Feasibility and acceptability of a high school relationship abuse and sexual assault bystander prevention program: School personnel and student perspectives. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518824655

Feagans Gould, L., Mendelson, T., Dariotis, J. K., Ancona, M., Smith, A. S. R., Gonzalez, A. A., Smith, A. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2014). Assessing fidelity of core components in a mindfulness and yoga intervention for urban youth: Applying the CORE Process. New Directions for Youth Development, 142, 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20097

Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Ennett, S. T., Suchindran, C., Benefield, T., & Linder, G. F. (2005). Assessing the effects of the dating violence prevention program "Safe Dates" using random coefficient regression modeling. Prevention Science, 6(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-005-0007-0

Foshee, V. A., Fletcher Linder, G., Bauman, K. E., Langwick, S. A., Arriaga, X. B., Heath, J. L., McMahon, P. M., & Bangdiwala, S. (1996). The safe dates project: Theoretical basis, evaluation design, and selected baseline findings. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12(5), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30235-6

Huckel Schneider, C., Milat, A. J., & Moore, G. (2016). Barriers and facilitators to evaluation of health policies and programs: Policymaker and researcher perspectives. Evaluation and Program Planning, 58, 208–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.011

Jackson-Gordon, R. (2022). Adolescent sexual violence prevention program implementation and sustainability: A mixed methods dissertation [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1649771242502504

Krisberg, K. (2018). CDC rape prevention program brings health lens to violence. The Nation’s Health, 48(2), S1–S6.

Luo, F., DeGue, S., & Le, V. D. (2020). Estimating from the payer perspective the implementation cost of Dating Matters®: A comprehensive teen dating violence prevention model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520980389

Maynard, B. R., Salas-Wright, C. P., & Vaughn, M. G. (2015). High school dropouts in emerging adulthood: Substance use, mental health problems, and crime. Community Mental Health Journal, 51(3), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-014-9760-5

McCauley, H. L., Campbell, R., Buchanan, N. T., & Moylan, C. A. (2019). Advancing theory, methods, and dissemination in sexual violence research to build a more equitable future: An intersectional, community-engaged approach. Violence Against Women, 25(16), 1906–1931. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219875823

National Center for Education Statistics. (2021). The condition of education 2021 [NCES 2021-144]. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/pdf/2021/coj_508c.pdf

Noonan, R. K., Emshoff, J. G., Mooss, A., Armstrong, M., Weinberg, J., & Ball, B. (2009). Adoption, adaptation, and fidelity of implementation of sexual violence prevention programs. Health Promotion Practice, 10(1), 59S-70S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839908329374

Ohio Alliance to End Sexual Violence. (n.d.). The Violence Against Women Act of reauthorization of 2021 [Fact sheet]. https://oaesv.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/factsheet_vawa_2021.pdf

Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7

SIECUS. (2022). Sex ed state law and policy chart: SIECUS state profiles: Jan. 2022. https://siecus.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/2021-Sex-Ed-State-Law-and-Policy-Chart-4.pdf

Smith, S. G., Zhang, X., Basile, K. C., Merrick, M. T., Wang, J., Kresnow, M., Chen, J. (2018). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2015 data brief – updated release. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Taylor, B. G., Stein, N. D., Mumford, E. A., & Woods, D. (2013). Shifting boundaries: An ex- perimental evaluation of a dating violence prevention program in middle schools. Prevention Science, 14(1), 64–76.

Townsend, S. M., & Campbell, R. (2007). Homogeneity in community-based rape prevention programs: Empirical evidence of institutional isomorphism. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(3), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20153

Townsend, S. M., & Campbell, R. (2008). Identifying common practices in community-based rape prevention programs. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 36(1-2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852350802022399

VERBI Software. (2019). MAXQDA 2020 [computer software]. VERBI Software. Available from maxqda.com.

Wallerstein, N., & Duran, B. (2010). Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: The intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. American Journal of Public Health, 100(S1), S40–S46. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.184036

Wallerstein, N., Duran, B., Oetzel, J., & Minkler, M. (2017). Community-based participatory research for health: Advancing social and health equity (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Wiltsey Stirman, S., Baumann, A. A., & Miller, C. J. (2019). The FRAME: An expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions. Implementation Science, 14(58), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0898-y

Downloads

Published

2022-12-15

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 4 (2022)

Section

Program & Practice Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.